12 ideas for NASCAR Executives to watch Collaboration reaches high point Visitors bring expertise to classroom Arizona's nside track to horse racing MLS club alliance helps UCCS stand out A job in golf: ‘Why they came here’ Abbey road and racetrack connections Nissan uses Rio rebrand for ‘Kicks’ Monster’s tantalizing HR reward
SBJ/Jan. 31-Feb. 6, 2011/In Depth
After lobbying, could Congress enter fray?
Published January 31, 2011, Page 26
Both the league and the NFLPA are active on Capitol Hill.
Smith, a former lawyer with Patton Boggs, has stayed true to his word, organizing delegations of players to Capitol Hill, threatening to make an issue of the NFL’s antitrust exemption for broadcast contracts and getting the AFL-CIO to lobby NFL owners.
But will it matter?
“I don’t understand it,” said Bill Gould, a former National Labor Relations Board chairman under President Bill Clinton and currently a Stanford law professor. “I just don’t see where it’s going.”
The two congressional-mandated possibilities to help settle the labor impasse, Gould said, would be to remove the antitrust exemption or impose compulsory arbitration. That seems highly unlikely given the new Republican majority in the House.
New House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) said earlier this month as players were visiting Capitol Hill, “That is a business dispute. The owners and players are both literally and figuratively big boys and do not need Congress to referee every dispute for them.”
Jeff Miller, the NFL’s senior vice president for government affairs, agreed that Congress should not be involved, though the league remains active on the Hill. He said the league would meet with all members of Congress visited by the NFLPA, and described the league’s role as reactive.
The NFLPA could not be reached for this story, but has cited publicly the NFL’s political action committee and campaign contributions as evidence that the union needs a stronger presence on Capitol Hill.