Guinness renews soccer tourney deal From the Field of Social Media New site for NBA Store MLB qualifying offers go oh-fer again New hospitality for Super Bowl NHL teams go solar Cartoon: Hungry for ratings High-end suites for Coliseum? NFL Net finds good spot for new shows Warriors take new sponsor at face value
SBJ/Dec. 6-12, 2010/OpinionPrint All
What do you do if you’re Brian France? You left Las Vegas last week celebrating one of the best seasons in memory on the track, a year of excellent competition and close races, but major questions about declining TV ratings and consumer interest continue to swirl around your sport.
France, NASCAR’s chairman, hasn’t stood still over the years, working to give an edge back to overly scripted drivers and improving the at-track product, as well as moving race times and agreeing to shift most of the final Chase races to ESPN. Some moves have worked and deserve credit. But NASCAR fights a PR battle against the perception that its best days are behind it.
Since 2006, NASCAR has lost an average of 2 million viewers, part of a steadily eroding viewer base. Such a decline can no longer be called a “blip” by those with an interest in the sport. To continue to refer to it that way only hurts prospects for effective messaging, which hasn’t been consistent enough during the current dip.
We understand that ratings are fickle and can fluctuate. Improving these viewer numbers is no easy fix, but NASCAR and its partners seem focused on figuring this out. One aspect of the deal that you wonder whether NASCAR wishes it could do over again: moving nine of the final 10 Chase races to ESPN. It’s only in year one, and while Bristol execs can argue all they want that moving races from ABC to ESPN hasn’t hurt the viewer numbers, that’s tough to buy. We have seen it with too many other sports properties across other networks. You move a sport from a more broadly distributed network, and your numbers will go down.
Some privately wish NASCAR would realize that its ratings glory days of 2005 may be gone forever and would instead more effectively argue where it is on the national landscape: a solid property that delivers consistent eyeballs and significant audiences, but skews older and hasn’t seen measurable growth in five years.
We understand that ESPN (and NASCAR) will be patient with this, and the hope is that being on ESPN attracts that 18- to 34-year-old audience racing desperately needs, but the jury is out. There is no exact science to boost the numbers. The mantra out of Las Vegas was consistent — better marketing by NASCAR and its media partners; a crying need for more stars, personalities and raw emotion from drivers; more effective use of social media to draw younger viewers; and changes to the system that place a greater emphasis on winning races.
Most observers feel NASCAR is lined up next year to see growth — Fox can promote Daytona coming out of the Super Bowl, the Winter Olympics aren’t around to provide competition, and this season’s Chase and on-track racing will provide some momentum.
Whether that includes more changes to the system by France and company remains to be seen. NASCAR’s top executives continue to pledge patience with the ratings, saying that viewers will find and appreciate the product now that the competition piece has been much improved. If you were Brian France, what more would you do?
Abraham Madkour can be reached at email@example.com.
From a media standpoint, 2010 has been the year of football in America. NFL ratings continue to hit all-time highs as fan interest also continues to climb. Through the first 12 weeks of the season, “Sunday Night Football” was Sunday night’s most-watched program and the No. 1 regularly scheduled prime-time show in all key adult and male demos.
Ratings on the college side, while not quite as spectacular, also continue to be in the upper echelons in terms of weekly ratings. ESPN’s coverage of the Boise State-Virginia Tech game on Sept. 6 delivered 9.9 million viewers, making it the second-most-watched college football game in ESPN history.
It’s not news to declare that football and/or live sports in general are great investments from a media perspective. As compared to traditional broadcast television shows, live sports are appointment television and TiVo-proof.
Part of what makes football and college football, in particular, so attractive is the ability to produce branded content with namely in-game, brand vignettes. Those are currently not allowed in the NFL, which is why their pregame, halftime and postgame shows are jammed with advertisers. Add in all the various teams, networks, etc., and a brand’s ability to regionalize its focus to hit its target demographic is a huge plus.
But with so much interest and investment in live sports, or in this case, college football, clutter begins to creep in. Just a quick survey of the insurance (Allstate, State Farm, Progressive, Travelers, Geico, etc.), quick-service restaurant (Applebee’s, Sonic, Chick-fil-A, etc.) or automotive (Nissan, Toyota, Ford, etc.) categories that are football media advertisers can be dizzying. So, if a brand wants to be a part of the excitement that is college football in America, how does it separate itself from all the other brands that also want to be in the space?
One word: Integration.
When we talk about integration, we mean specifically taking a media buy and executing across other messaging platforms. Some of the most effective strategies for media integration cross over into:
1. Digital: Social media, online content, online video, online contests.
2. Event: On-site events, experiential marketing tours, corporate hospitality.
Digging deeper in the categories above, some standout programs include how Allstate integrates its campaign off the field through its “Good Hands” goalpost nets program. The long-standing program, now in its sixth season, puts the Allstate logo on nets behind the goalposts in college stadiums. More recently, Applebee’s has been pushing its restaurants as a home for the ultimate game-day watching experience with DirecTV packages and including ESPN personality Chris Berman in its advertising. From the automotive side, Nissan does a great job connecting with college football fans through the 2010 College Football Experience Tour, which includes an integrated tour microsite and sweepstakes opportunities.
These college football-related programs are just a sampling of ways brands and agencies are integrating media buys beyond the broadcasts. With a potential lockout looming for the NFL in 2011, college football should be included as part of an integrated sports marketing strategy. To break through the media clutter, executing an activation program is the best strategy for a brand to score the most points in the media game.
Larry Mann (firstname.lastname@example.org) is executive vice president for business development at rEvolution.