Sponsorship and driving social change Mythbusting college sports for sponsors Cartoon: Unpacking his challenges From the Field of Sponsorship College hiring practices suffering From The Executive Editor: Fan passion From the Field of Team Management Bringing common sense to Cooperstown Cartoon: March Madness Sutton Impact: Sponsor summits
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBJ/December 10 - 16, 2001/Opinion
College payment plan benefits only the rich
Published December 10, 2001
Paying NCAA players may be a necessity in the future, but the plan outlined by Maryland's Deborah Yow ["Pay players based on merchandise sold," Nov. 19] is quite short-sighted. Paying players with merchandise revenue would simply be a case of the rich getting richer. Jersey sales are prominent in the highest-profile programs (see television conferences) and usually sport the number of the most prominent player on those teams. While the best players in the high-profile programs and conferences would benefit from Ms. Yow's plan, other players on those very same teams would again get nothing.
The Peyton Mannings of the world would have money waiting for them at graduation (that they probably don't need) while the back-up offensive tackle on that same team would still be broke.
While the other guest columnists of this publication gave solid ideas on the future of college athletics, I believe Ms. Yow missed the mark.