ACB Addresses Sunday's Brawl Jagmohan Dalmiya Named BCCI President Rinehart Backs Aussie Swim Team Sydney FC To Play Tottenham NRL Beefs Up Its Integrity Unit Financial Pressures Good For Brisbane Bid Eels Discuss Preseason Game In U.S. League Notes Seifert: Schedule Adjustments Unlikely Law Change Could Lead To Swiss ePrix
Enter amount in full numerical value, without currency symbol or commas (ex: 3000000).
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD Global/June 5, 2014/Leagues and Governing Bodies
National Rugby League To Discuss Move Toward National Insurance For Players
Published June 5, 2014
DRUG TESTING: In Sydney, Proszenko reported in a separate piece the NRL "has begun testing players for prescription drugs this week, becoming the first governing sports body in Australia to do so." The Australian Rugby League Commission "informed its 16 clubs in writing that Laverty Pathology had been engaged to begin the groundbreaking testing procedures from Monday following agreement with the Rugby League Players' Association." The independent third party "will screen players for illicit drugs that covers amphetamines" -- such as speed, ecstasy and ice -- ketamine, cannabis, cocaine, opiates and synthetic versions of those drugs, such as synthetic cannabis and synthetic bath salts. But it is the testing for prescription drugs benzodiazepines -- commonly known as Valium, Mogadon and Xanax -- along with zolpidems including Stilnox, Dormizole and Somidem that the league "is most interested in." NRL COO Jim Doyle said, "There have been suggestions that some players are abusing prescription drugs but there is no evidence to back that up. Rather than relying on anecdotal evidence and rumour we are going to conduct tests to determine if we have a problem" (SMH, 6/4). In Melbourne, Dan Harrison reported new Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority CEO Ben McDevitt said that "show cause notices could be issued in relation to performance-enhancing drug use at AFL and NRL clubs within weeks." McDevitt told a Senate hearing late on Tuesday that "the agency was approaching the task with 'urgency' but it did not want to 'sacrifice certainty for speed'" (THE AGE, 6/4).