Leicester City Sacks Claudio Ranieri Six Nations Jeopardizing Sponsorship Appeal Hangin' With ... Tom Elsden Groups To Bid For Southampton, Source Says Football Betting Reports Are 'Tip Of The Iceberg' 'This Girl Can' Campaign Promotes Activism Orange Interested In Canal+ Sports Rights Pacquiao, Khan Confirm Fight Negotiations IMG Produces Celtic Football Documentary Africa Wants 10 World Cup Places
SBD Global/April 4, 2014/Leagues and Governing BodiesPrint All
Australian Athletics "has received a slap down from the Australian Sports Commission, in its report card on sports that receive annual government funding, for its failure to have a merger between senior and junior bodies," according to Rupert Guinness of the SYDNEY MORNING HERALD. The two main bodies -- Athletics Australia and Little Athletics Australia -- "worked with the commission last year to try and formulate a merger." When it came to voting on the proposal in December, AA "endorsed it unanimously, but it was voted against by LAA -- a self-funding independent body." Commission Chair John Wylie said that a merger "would have many gains for the sport," from improved commercial sponsorship and development pathways for athletes, to "cross fertilisation" of officials and coaches. Wylie: "The world is moving on and athletics needs to get on the wagon, needs to get on the program in our view" (SMH, 4/3). In Melbourne, Samantha Lane reported ASC has put AA and Cycling Australia "on notice, saying both organisations are lagging behind the five other top taxpayer funded sports in the country." While Wylie "heaped praise on a reformed Swimming Australia and Hockey Australia, and said rowing, sailing and basketball had all made 'good progress'" since new mandatory governance principals were outlined in the Winning Edge manifesto 15 months ago, he "did not hide the commission's disappointment in operational failings of the two other major sports" that receive more than A$5M ($4.6M) annually from government grants (THE AGE, 4/4). Lane also reported one of the ASC's "most richly funded sports has met a soon-to-be-mandatory 40 per cent female board member ratio." While Hockey Australia "is the lone shining example," the national governing bodies for athletics, swimming, cycling, rowing and sailing -- and the worst placed of the country’s most richly taxpayer-funded sports associations, Basketball Australia -- "are under pressure to reform within a year or risk having their funding docked." Of the seven sporting associations that receive more than $5M annually in grants from the commission, only Hockey Australia "has met the target for women on its board." The gender breakdown of Hockey Australia’s board is now 55% female and 45% male. Basketball Australia’s recently replenished six-member board, meanwhile, has one female member, Cheryl Hayman. Swimming Australia, under new leadership, is "faring marginally better than basketball in terms of board diversity after adding a second female director to its hierarchy since the launch of Winning Edge" (THE AGE, 4/3).
IN THE POOL: In Sydney, Nicole Jeffery reported swimming "is back in favour" of the ASC. Wylie "singled out swimming for praise." Wylie: "I commend the united approach taken by sports to embrace reform, no better exemplified than by Swimming Australia, which has, through its renewed leadership, implemented significant constitutional change and an improved team culture." AIS Dir Matt Favier, the sport's architect, said that the general findings "were encouraging." Favier: "We have seen progress and improvement across the system" (THE AUSTRALIAN, 4/4).
Angry officials from National Rugby League club Newcastle "have hit out at Melbourne over the club's defence of Jordan McLean and questioned why his Storm teammates Jesse and Kenny Bromwich weren't also charged over the tackle that resulted in Alex McKinnon suffering a broken neck and spinal damage," according to Brad Walter of the SYDNEY MORNING HERALD. The Knights issued a statement following the seven-match ban imposed on McLean in which the club outlined its "frustration" at four aspects of the case, including the suggestion by Melbourne defense counsel Nick Ghabar's at Wednesday night's hearing that McKinnon "had contributed to his injuries." The Newcastle statement said the club took "great offence" to the line of defense, while the Knights "were also unhappy" about several other aspects of the case. First, only McLean was charged and "not the Bromwich brothers as they were also involved in the tackle." The Storm's decision to appeal against the NRL's initial decision to stand McLean down after the hearing "was adjourned for a week." And the "inconsistencies in gradings with other recent dangerous throw cases" (SMH, 4/3). In Sydney, Brent Read reported the Knights "had two press releases prepared" which were contingent on whether McLean received a 10-week suspension or more. This is "an indication that they felt seven weeks was not enough." The Knights reaction "adds another layer to a case that has already divided the game." Melbourne could yet "pour fuel on the fire by appealing the suspension, a move that would no doubt raise the ire of the Knights." Storm CEO Mark Evans: "We're not going to make any quick decisions. It's all a bit raw. It's a very delicate situation on a whole range of levels" (THE AUSTRALIAN, 4/4).
Rugby Union Players Association CEO Greg Harris "has placed his New Zealand and South African counterparts on notice that RUPA intends pushing for Super Rugby to be reduced to a 10-team trans-Tasman competition in which South Africa would play only a peripheral role" (THE AUSTRALIAN, 4/4). ... To ensure that boxers and coaches remain affected by the Federation’s int'l termination and de-recognition at home, the Indian Olympic Association on Thursday "formed an ad-hoc Committee to handle issues related to coaching and selection in the beleaguered sport." The first Exec Council meeting of the IOA was held on Thursday, "after the lifting of suspension by the IOC," under the chairmanship of N. Ramachandran (PTI, 4/3).