India Not Giving Up Hope For F1 Return ARU CEO Pulver: NRC Won't Be Delayed QRU Opts Out Of Merger Plan Canberra Knights Become CBR Brave Team Australia To Assign Local Sailors League Notes Is Gale The Man To Step In As AFL CEO? Q&A With AFL CEO Andrew Demetriou Spanish Bid For Super Rugby Sharks Supplements Penalties To Stand
Enter amount in full numerical value, without currency symbol or commas (ex: 3000000).
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD Global/October 25, 2013/Leagues and Governing Bodies
Cricket Australia Revenue Will Reach $1B In Next Cycle After Rising 63% During Last Cycle
Published October 25, 2013
BOARDROOM UNCERTAINTY: In Sydney, Peter Lalor reported CA, "under siege" ahead of an Ashes series England is favored to win for a fourth consecutive time, has "dismissed claims by Ricky Ponting the national side hadn't received the support it needed, with the board throwing its backing behind" CEO James Sutherland. In turn, Sutherland "has backed" High-Performance Manager Pat Howard. Sutherland "hit out at claims by Ponting that Cricket Australia came to the realisation that it needed to spend more money on the team only after sides such as England had passed them by." He said, "The reality is that through that period our expenditure on high performance and elite cricket grew from A$39M to A$75M. That includes player payments, but if you take player payments out, it grew from A$7M to A$19M. For the life of me I can't understand how that is a signal of an elite organisation that is not investing in high performance or elite performance" (THE AUSTRALIAN, 10/25).
CEO'S JOB SAFE: Also in Sydney, Chloe Saltau reported Edwards said that Sutherland "will keep his job as chief executive of Cricket Australia even if the Test team loses the Ashes five-nil." As Edwards expressed bewilderment that the CEO "was under public pressure after 12 years at the helm," a belligerent Sutherland lashed out at the suggestion made by Ponting. Edwards said, "There is no discontent whatsoever with James' performance and I am bewildered where the story has come from." Asked why he should not be held accountable for the decline of Australian cricket during his tenure, Sutherland said, "I am accountable to the board of Cricket Australia and they set the strategy for Australian cricket and they set my objectives. I am very clear on those objectives and what we need to do. The chairman and the board are the judge of my performance, the people who work for me are my responsibility" (SYDNEY MORNING HERALD, 10/24).