F1 Prepares For Season Of Uncertainty Low Attendance Numbers For NRL Openers Documentary Looks At Concussions Basketball ACT Looking For Next CEO League Notes India Not Giving Up Hope For F1 Return QRU Opts Out Of Merger Plan League Notes Is Gale The Man To Step In As AFL CEO? Q&A With AFL CEO Andrew Demetriou
Enter amount in full numerical value, without currency symbol or commas (ex: 3000000).
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD Global/March 28, 2013/Leagues and Governing Bodies
IPL's Decision To Withdraw Sri Lankan Players From Chennai Matches Draws Criticism
Published March 28, 2013
KEEPING QUIET: The PTI reported taking a potshot at arch rival Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Chief M. Karunanidhi on the Sri Lankan Tamils issue, Jayalalithaa on Wednesday said that "while he had demanded that India should not take part" in the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting, "he kept mum on Lankan cricketers playing in an IPL team owned by his family." Jayalalithaa: "Karunanidhi, who had revived the TESO, demanded that India should not take part in the CHOGM, but remained silent on Sri Lankan players in the team owned by his family. This is the height of selfishness" (PTI, 3/27).
HITTING BACK: In New Dehli, PTI wrote former Sri Lankan captain Arjuna Ranatunga on Wednesday "slammed IPL governing council's decision to withdraw Sri Lankan cricketers from Chennai matches of the tournament and asked the players to opt out of the entire high-profile event beginning April 3." Ranatunga: "... as far as cricketers are concerned I think if they can't play in south India (Chennai) they should play in other part either. I personally feel if players are not welcomed in one part of India they should not be part of any IPL." Ranatunga termed the decision "a political gimmick and said that the IPL governing council should have taken all the matches away from Chennai" (PTI, 3/27). Former Sri Lankan cricketer Muttiah Muralitharan said, "It's a sad (day) for cricket as we are not allowed to play in a certain part of India. It is a government decision, if they cannot provide security for us, we have to be cautious" (PTI, 3/27).