SBD/January 11, 2017/Events and Attractions

Print All
  • Soccer Leaders For U.S., Canada, Mexico In Talks About Co-Hosting '26 World Cup

    Montagliani said the decision to expand the World Cup was based on facts

    Soccer leaders in the U.S., Canada and Mexico are "in talks about joining forces to stage the biggest-ever edition" of the FIFA World Cup in '26, according to Tariq Panja of BLOOMBERG NEWS. The U.S. "would be the tournament’s main host with the most games, including the final." Should the plan be approved, the '26 World Cup "would be the first time three countries have staged the same event." FIFA VP and CONCACAF President Victor Montagliani said there seems to be a "prevailing thought that a confederation-type bid with multiple hosts is probably good" for the event. Panja notes the bid has a "strong chance of success as Europe and Asia are excluded following the selection of Russia and Qatar as hosts of the next two editions," in '18 and '22, respectively. Montagliani said that a formal proposal is "likely to be formulated and presented to CONCACAF’s other members around the time of the next FIFA Congress set for May in Bahrain." Panja notes the '26 host winner will be "picked via a poll" of FIFA's entire 211-nation membership, "rather than just its executive board" (BLOOMBERG NEWS, 1/11).

    NEW WAY OF DOING THINGS: FIFA yesterday voted to expand the World Cup from 32 to 48 teams starting with the '26 tournament, and in N.Y., Andrew Keh notes the move was the "largest expansion, in percentage terms, for the World Cup since it went to 24 teams" from 16 in '82. Any plan to "increase the size of the tournament field ... seemed specifically tailored to appeal to smaller soccer nations, particularly those in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean that often feel underrepresented at the World Cup." Montagliani said, "It was done in a very good way, and the decision was made on the facts and figures, not on a wink and a nod. Maybe the time has come that we don’t do things on a wink and a nod anymore" (N.Y. TIMES, 1/11). The WALL STREET JOURNAL's Joshua Robinson notes FIFA's move comes as the organization cited the "need to be more inclusive." FIFA President Gianni Infantino said, "We are in the 21st century and we have to shape the football World Cup of the 21st century. It is the future. We have to look at football (as) more than just Europe and South America." FIFA "hasn’t yet decided who will host the first 48-team World Cup, but the logistical demands of hosting such a large event with match venues, practice facilities, accommodation and infrastructure already narrow the field to a small handful." The U.S. is "widely considered to be the front-runner" to host the event (WALL STREET JOURNAL, 1/11). In DC, Simon Evans notes no decision has "yet been taken on how the 16 extra places will be divided among regional confederations, or how the qualification process will work." Neither will be "easy to work out" (WASHINGTON POST, 1/11).

    THE PROS: ESPN's Tony Kornheiser said the expansion will increase the number of single-elimination games, "so it's more exciting" ("PTI," ESPN, 1/10). In DC, Steven Goff writes, "The World Cup is growing by 50 percent, but will it be half as good?" (WASHINGTON POST, 1/11). ESPN FC’s Gabriele Marcotti wrote FIFA's "mandate is to grow the game, and giving money back to the member associations is probably more desirable than having it sit and accumulate in a Swiss bank account." What will be "more problematic is finding a host nation that can provide 48 acceptable training bases." If the '26 event is held in the U.S., "that won't be a problem." Marcotti: "Elsewhere, it could be"  (ESPNFC.us, 1/10). Marcotti said, "It's simply designed to get more nations into the World Cup so that more parts of the world can feel like they're a part of this" ("ESPN FC," ESPNews, 1/10). In Toronto, Kurt Larson writes more money to more member nations "means the growth of the game." The "prospect of more soccer and assisting struggling member nations greatly outweighs the potential for a few early blowouts and cagey group phase games" (TORONTO SUN, 1/11). ESPN FC's Marcotti noted there is a "natural conservatism to the game," and many of the arguments being made "were the same freakouts they had when FIFA moved from 24 to 32 teams and before that when they moved from 16 to 24 teams" ("OTL," ESPN, 1/10).

    THE CONS: SI.com's Grant Wahl wrote he is worried the decision to expand will be "seen as the day FIFA ruined the World Cup." Wahl noted growth and "making money aren’t necessarily bad things, but the biggest problem that Infantino needs to fix is FIFA and confederation corruption ... and not the size of the World Cup." Following the blueprint of former FIFA President Sepp Blatter and "raising payouts only increases suspicions that the same shady folks at the end of those handouts will continue with business as usual" (SI.com, 1/10). ESPN's Shaka Hislop said, "I'm not sure that is in the best interests of the global game ... (because) it becomes too watered down" ("OTL," ESPN, 1/10). ESPN's Max Bretos said there is "a lot not to like" about the decision to expand. He called it a "watered-down tournament" and a "money decision" ("SportsCenter," ESPN, 1/11). ESPN's Hislop said, "It's a dilution of quality when you have just short of 25% of FIFA's member associations qualifying for the World Cup." Hislop: "There's been no change in terms of FIFA's own constitution and way of doing of business in writing, other than promises. I feel it's there to be exploited and it's only a matter of time" ("ESPN FC," ESPNews, 1/10).

    Print | Tags: Events and Attractions, FIFA World Cup
  • Atlanta CFP Committee Eyes Momentum For '18 Title Game At Mercedes-Benz Stadium

    Bill Hancock touted the walkability from Atlanta hotels to Mercedes-Benz Stadium

    The Atlanta Football Host Committee yesterday praised Tampa’s handling of the CFP title game and "expressed confidence" the $1.5B Mercedes-Benz Stadium and its "proximity to downtown attractions and hotels will build" on the CFP’s momentum when the site hosts next year's game, according to Tim Tucker of the ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION. About 40 people affiliated with the Atlanta committee "were in Tampa at the CFP’s invitation for a behind-the-scenes look at how the championship game operates." The group "observed all aspects of the spectacle -- stadium set-up and operations, public safety, traffic planning, marketing, branding, signage, volunteer programs, hospitality programs, media operations and a myriad of ancillary activities." Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed said he saw a "highly organized event that managed traffic flow well, that got people in and out of the game efficiently" and had "terrific customer service.” Reed: "They also had very strong branding without it being overwhelming." CFP Exec Dir Bill Hancock said he expects the distinguishing features of the Atlanta game to be "the stadium, the activity downtown and what we call the 'walkability’ from the hotels to the stadium" (ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION, 1/11).

    LET'S PLAY TWO: In Tampa, Danielson & Dawson in a front-page piece note Tampa officials were so encouraged with this year's game that they met yesterday afternoon to "start planning a bid to bring the game back" in '21. But there were a "few complaints, generally concerning traffic and crowds around Raymond James Stadium before and after the game." There were "two-hour lines of fans waiting to get into the stadium." Another issue was traffic "leaving the stadium after the game was gridlocked" (TAMPA BAY TIMES, 1/11). Hancock in an email wrote that while the calendar for '21 is "'not in stone,' he expects to send requests for proposals to interested venues late this summer or early fall." Hancock said the CFP will "make the decision" in the spring of '18. Dallas Stadium Events Organizing Committee President Rick Baker said his group is "monitoring the situation and are excited about receiving the RFP and having the opportunity to put North Texas' best foot forward to again host college football's biggest game." In Dallas, Chuck Carlton notes Santa Clara and New Orleans will host the title game in '19 and '20 after Atlanta. North Texas "wouldn't be able to bid" for '22, with the Goodyear Cotton Bowl "hosting a national semifinal." A Cowboys bid for a Super Bowl "could also complicate matters" (DALLAS MORNING NEWS, 1/11).

    RINSE, REPEAT: Hancock said that as much as possible, banners and other promotional material will be "reused for next year's playoff final in Atlanta." In Tampa, Christopher O'Donnell in a front-page piece notes the six "glistening silver foam football player statues that stood outside venues like Raymond James Stadium and the Florida Aquarium last weekend will hibernate for the next 12 months in a Dallas warehouse." That is also the "destination of other reusable signage such as street-lamp banners that advertise Playoff Fan Central but omit both the host city name and the playoff year" (TAMPA BAY TIMES, 1/11). 

    Print | Tags: Events and Attractions
Video Powered By - Castfire CMS Powered By - Sitecore

Report a Bug