First Data Lands Rights To Mets' Fla. Complex Clark Calls MLB Rule Change Discussions "Ongoing" Four Brands Sign Up As WBC Global Sponsors Cubs Using "That's Cub" As '17 Marketing Slogan NFL Optimistic On Expanded Mexico Presence Wiggins' Former Coach Defends WNBA Red Sox To Implement New Personnel Database Astros' Crane Continues To Increase Payroll Manfred Criticizes MLBPA On Rule Changes Sources: Facebook Could Stream MLB Games
SBD/April 15, 2014/Leagues and Governing Bodies
La Russa Happy With Early Results On MLB's Replay System, But Concerns Still Exist
Published April 15, 2014
DO THE RIGHT THING: In Seattle, Larry Stone writes under the header, "Replay Is The Right Call For Baseball, Even If It's Taking A While To Get It Right." There have been some "clunky, time-consuming reviews; unnecessary reviews instituted merely because the manager had a challenge to burn; and challenges that couldn’t be issued because the manager had already burned the one he had." However, the "most troubling" aspect has been the "(apparent) incorrect calls meted out after the replays had been scrutinized back at the command center in New York." Stone: "After all, that was the point of the whole thing in the first place: Get it right." Mariners manager Lloyd McClendon on Sunday said, "I’m really worried about where we’re headed with replay and the effect it’s having on the games and the effect it’s having on the fans.” Stone: "I'm right with him. Not worried enough to scrap the system, mind you." One thing that is "not so complex, and must be fixed, pronto, is making sure" that the $30M Replay Operations Center has "access to the same television angles as home viewers" (SEATTLE TIMES, 4/15). MLB Network’s Cliff Floyd: "Instant replay is going to work. You have some kinks right now and I think that’s a part of any new system, but at the end of the day, you are getting these calls right that in the past we have seen get called wrong” (“MLB Tonight,” MLB Network, 4/14). ESPN's Mike Greenberg said, "Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. I felt like they were so concerned with finding a perfect system ... that they weren't just willing to settle for good. This is good. This is better than not having anything." He added, "They got far more calls wrong without the replay than they will with. Will they have to iron out a few wrinkles in this? Yes. Is it ideal? No. But life isn't about perfect. Life isn't a game of perfect” (“Mike & Mike,” ESPN Radio, 4/15).
NEED TO SEE EVERYTHING: MLB Network’s Tom Verducci said MLB has to "make sure that those umpires reviewing these plays see the feeds that the fan sees." An issue came up Saturday during the Red Sox-Yankees game where FS1's cameras caught a shot of a runner clearly off second base, but that was not available to the umpires. Verducci: "They have to see the same feeds that the fan sees at home. You can’t have Johnny Six-Pack on the sofa, at home, getting a better look than the umpire making the call. It just can’t happen” ("MLB Tonight," MLB Network, 4/14). ESPN's Barry Larkin said, "They're supposed to be able to see all the angles to get all of (the) calls right. I would change that for sure" ("Baseball Tonight," ESPN, 4/15).
TOO LATE TO GO BACK: In West Palm Beach, Dave George writes the "whole system is new," so there will be "tweaks and improvements." However, MLB has "gone rolling and bouncing and falling down a slippery slope" since the '08 decision to review home runs. The game is "slow enough without making everybody grind even harder, but there's no going back now" (PALM BEACH POST, 4/15). ESPN's Tony Kornheiser said, "You cannot put the toothpaste back in the tube. You have to have this system" ("PTI," ESPN, 4/14).