Baseball HOF Expects Large Crowd L.A. Country Club Hosting '23 U.S. Open Players' Awards Fails To Draw Star Attendees Venue For Cotto-Alvarez Still Undecided First NBPA Awards Deemed A Success Organizers Make Canadian Open More Canadian Alabama PGA Tour Event Deemed Successful UFC Eyes AT&T Stadium For UFC 194 130,000 Fans Pack GABP For ASG Festivities British Open Letting Trump Situation Play Out
SBD/December 12, 2013/Events and Attractions
Intercollegiate Athletic Forum: Playoff Committee Members Discuss Selection Process
Published December 12, 2013
DELICATE DISCUSSIONS: The committee members said it was likely that they would recuse themselves from discussions on schools, or maybe even conferences, with which they are associated. Clemson AD Dan Radakovich said that the committee likely would try to mirror the NCAA tournament basketball committee in that respect, something with which Big East senior adviser Tom Jernstedt agreed. Jernstedt said, “In basketball, when SEC Commissioner (Mike) Slive and Big Ten Commissioner (Jim) Delany were on the (NCAA tournament selection) committee, and any team from the SEC and Big Ten was under consideration, they’d walk down the hall and were not involved in any part of that discussion. There was a real comfort level with the committee.”
ONE VOTE, ONE VOICE: The committee members said that they are not likely to release a list of which members voted for which schools, but will opt instead to speak as one voice. “When we used to lose to Oklahoma, I got a whole box of hate mail,” Osborne said. “Somebody blew up my mailbox. I don’t want to go back to those days again where my vote is listed and the fifth-place team is out to get me.” Osborne praised the BCS, saying, “The top two teams usually have fallen into place. The BCS has worked pretty well over most years. I think there will be quite a bit of controversy between those three, four, five, six and seven. Therein will lie the difficulty.”
For more from the Intercollegiate Athletic Forum, please see our On The Ground blog.