SBD/November 13, 2013/Leagues and Governing Bodies

Print All
  • NHL GMs Consider Extending Overtime Period To Cut Down Need For Shootouts

    Proposed changes to overtime rules could cut down the number of shootouts

    Changing the structure of overtime in NHL regular-season games "might not be imminent, but continued discussions among the league's general managers show there is interest in extending the extra period to cut down on the number of shootouts," according to Stephen Whyno of the CP. Overtime was one of many of topics discussed at last night's annual GMs meeting the day after the Hockey HOF induction in Toronto. Red Wings Exec VP & GM Ken Holland said that they have been discussing "making overtime 10 minutes to cut down on shootouts 'to some degree.'" Holland proposed "five minutes of four-on-four and then three minutes of three-on-three." However, Blues President of Hockey Operations & GM Doug Armstrong and others "want simply 10 minutes of four-on-four." Holland said that it is "possible overtime gets extended to seven or eight minutes instead of 10, which he considers an improvement he could live with" (CP, 11/12). In L.A., Helene Elliott noted any proposed extension of OT "would have to be balanced against the reality that ice quality deteriorates late in games at many NHL rinks, and playing an extra 10 minutes on sub-standard ice could hurt the standard of play." Resurfacing the ice before OT "would improve playing conditions but would also extend the length of regular-season games, running afoul of TV broadcasters who have limited windows to air games and presenting a problem for fans who don’t want games to last three-plus hours" (LATIMES.com, 11/12). SPORTSNET.ca's Scott Morrison wrote as "exciting as the shootout has been, it has, in the eyes of many, also run its course." GMs, coaches and players alike are "tired of seeing too many games decided by a gimmick, however entertaining it may be, especially with playoff races so tight and the stakes so high" (SPORTSNET.ca, 11/12).

    OTHER TOPICS UP FOR DEBATE: ESPN.com's Pierre LeBrun noted the GMs also held a "discussion on fighting, but certainly nothing was decided Tuesday other than to talk about it again in March" during the league's three-day GMs meeting. There was talk about goalie fights, and NHL Senior Exec VP/Hockey Operations Colin Campbell confirmed the issue "will come up again" at the next GMs meeting. Some GMs still were "unclear on how the playoff format worked under the NHL's new alignment, and the league's hockey operations department cleared that up for them." NHL Dir of Officiating Stephen Walkom also presented a "hybrid icing report, as some GMs have been grumbling this season about how the new rule has been working" (ESPN.com, 11/12).

    LOCKER ROOM TALK: The GLOBE & MAIL's Eric Duhatschek notes in light of the Dolphins' bullying scandal, NHL GMs were told by league officials yesterday to "remind their own players about what behaviour will and will not be tolerated in dressing rooms." Hazing rituals long had been a "regular part of NHL locker-room culture," but Lightning VP & GM Steve Yzerman said that the era "has long since passed" (GLOBE & MAIL, 11/13). Flames President of Hockey Operations Brian Burke said, "We've never allowed hazing on any of my teams. ... No rookie initiations, no shaving, no physical abuse whatsoever." He added, "One of the forms of abuse is to make the rookies (shell out) a huge tab for a rookie dinner, where it costs them 15 to 20 grand. We have a cap of $5,000 on the rookie dinner. No rookie can pay more than $5,000. There's no physical abuse, no racial abuse, no homophobic abuse. So I'm not worried about having that situation on our team" (TORONTO SUN, 11/13). THE HOCKEY NEWS' Adam Proteau wrote "bravo" to Burke for "making clear his no-hazing policy." However, the core culture "of any team's dressing room won't be proper unless the players within that room uphold expectations of common decency" (THEHOCKEYNEWS.com, 11/12).

    Print | Tags: Leagues and Governing Bodies, NHL
  • League Notes

    MLB Exec VP/Baseball Operations Joe Torre yesterday said that expanded instant replay "remains on track to be implemented in time for the 2014 season even though several details remain to be ironed out." MLB.com's Paul Hagen reported the MLB Rules Committee "will have informal discussions" today on the matter before "meeting again at the Winter Meetings next month." Torre said that he "didn't know whether there will be a vote on instant replay during the Owners Meetings" this week in Orlando (MLB.com, 11/12).

    DEAL BREAKER: ESPN.com's Chris Broussard cited sources as saying that the NBA is "engaged in settlement talks with Ozzie and Daniel Silna to end a contract that has long been described as 'the greatest sports business deal of all time.'" The Silna brothers are the former owners the ABA Spirits of St. Louis, and when the ABA merged with the NBA in '76, the Silnas "agreed to dissolve their team in exchange for a small percentage of the NBA's future broadcast revenue." It is becoming a "financial windfall for the Silnas," as they "receive 1/7 of the television revenues of the four ABA teams that were absorbed: the Spurs, Nuggets, Nets and Pacers" (ESPN.com, 11/11).

    SQUEEZE PLAY: In Newark, Frank Giase wrote MLS "made the right call this season in taking a break for international games," but fans have to wonder if an "exception for the playoffs would have been the right thing to do." The break "stretched out the season, and yes, MLS Cup final will be played Dec. 7 ... but the offseason had been too long anyway, and there were complaints about that as well." So it "all seemed like a good idea." But good ideas "can also be tweaked, and MLS failed to adjust the playoff schedule when the United States cruised through CONCACAF World Cup qualifying play after losing its opening game" (NJ.com, 11/12).

    Print | Tags: Leagues and Governing Bodies
Video Powered By - Castfire CMS Powered By - Sitecore

Report a Bug