MLB Attendance Flat In '14 Jim Crane Committed To Rebuilding Astros TBS Sees Uptick In Wild Card Rating Tustin Wants To Recoup Angels Ballpark Investment New Maple Leaf Square Name Skips Confusion Arizona Fall League To Test Pace-Of-Play Ideas AEG Seeks Extension On L.A. Stadium Project Patterson: Taxpayers Should Help With New UT Arena Twins To Replace Manager, Retain GM Stanford Teams With AT&T, Sporting Innovations
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/July 25, 2013/Facilities
Wrigley Field Upgrades Get City Council Approval, But Some Details Remain Unresolved
Published July 25, 2013
DRAMATIC ALTERATIONS: In Illinois, Don Babwin notes Wrigley's upgrades, some of which "could be completed as early as next season," collectively "represent the most dramatic additions since at least 1988, when the Cubs became the last team in the majors to install lights" (Illinois DAILY HERALD, 7/25). ESPN CHICAGO's Jon Greenberg notes the team's entire building process is "expected to take five years and should provide the Cubs with plenty of revenue streams." A source said that the team's new videoboard is "probably two years away from being up at Wrigley Field." If the Cubs can begin construction this fall, the "first order of business will be to improve the player facilities, which include expanding the home clubhouse and adding batting cages and workout facilities, along with other amenities common at other stadiums." The team also will "expand the visitors clubhouse as part of an expansion on Sheffield and Addison that will include a new restaurant" (ESPNCHICAGO.com, 7/24). In Chicago, Rick Morrissey writes, "This is going to be a better Wrigley Field for fans, or least the fans who want a clean, comfortable, more modern experience at the ballpark." Morrissey: "I used to be in the keep-Wrigley-as-a-museum-piece camp, but then I opened my eyes to the disagreeable seats, the cramped concourses and the nasty bathrooms. The wider my eyes, the more I wanted to see replays and stats on a video scoreboard, too." The cement and "old girders don’t make Wrigley Field; the people in the stands do" (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 7/25).
CHECKS & BALANCES: Tunney said, "The balance that I’ve been trying to negotiate has been exhilarating, upsetting, exciting, exasperating ... I care too much and I know too much about my community." In Chicago, Fran Spielman writes Tunney "drove a hard bargain on behalf of his constituents and small businesses." Tunney: "Just make sure the Cubs do what they say they’re gonna do. No more head fakes." He added that he "wasn’t looking for a 'civil war' with the Cubs." But Spielman writes the team "had better honor its commitments to local residents if they want to avoid one." Tunney: "What is the adage? You have to be a good neighbor. Otherwise, I’ll be up your butt every day." Ricketts after the "unanimous vote he thought might never come" issued a statement thanking Emanuel, Tunney and the city council for "giving him the flexibility he needs to renovate Wrigley without a public subsidy." The Ricketts family has been "miffed by what they viewed as Tunney’s 'bizarre comments' on the Council floor -- particularly the alderman’s claim that the Cubs 'are supposed to be a catalyst for the other businesses, not try to snuff them out'" (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 7/25). Also in Chicago, Mark Brown writes Tunney "still harbors a lot of resentment against the Cubs, in part for transgressions committed" by previous team Owner the Tribune Co. As with "many longtime neighborhood business owners and residents who predated the 'Wrigleyville' resurgence, Tunney also is resentful of those who think the Cubs are entirely responsible for the community’s economic well-being" (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 7/25).