Reds Upgrading GABP Ahead Of All-Star Game Flames Close To Arena Announcement? Vegas Arena Could Be First With Retractable Roof Univ. Of Nevada Proposes Mackay Upgrades Facility Notes Saints' Benson Gives $11M To Pro Football HOF Bucks' Edens Outlines Downtown Arena Vision Jags Seeking State Money For Upgrades Monmouth Rolling Out Fantasy Sports Bets Falcons Stadium Bidding For Super Bowl, CFP
SBD/July 15, 2013/Facilities
Warriors' S.F. Arena Target Date Likely Delayed; Oakland Pushing A's Venue Option
Published July 15, 2013
GOING TO BAT FOR THE A'S: In Oakland, Monte Poole wrote, "For folks laboring to keep the A's in Oakland, the journey toward reality is shorter than it was a week ago." A lawsuit settlement last Thursday "opens the door for Oakland to develop the 50-acre Howard Terminal property just north of Jack London Square." This is significant because Howard Terminal is the site for which MLB "has expressed a preference (over the Coliseum site) for a new ballpark." Though full access to Howard Terminal "can't be granted until the seven-member Board of Port Commissioners votes this Thursday to approve the lawsuit settlement, it is expected." After which the city "could roll up its sleeves and see how viable HT is for redevelopment around a ballpark." Yet the "anticipated availability is enough to fortify the enthusiasm of civic leaders and fan coalitions fighting to keep the A's in Oakland." Team Owner Lew Wolff has "consistently reiterated that he doesn't believe HT is feasible and that, moreover, Oakland is not an option." But gaining access to Howard Terminal is "an essential element of Oakland's rally" against Wolff and co-Owner John Fisher. It gives Oakland "site control," something it "could not offer last year and is needed to bolster its pitch to MLB." It is the location "most likely to receive the support of MLB." If Howard Terminal is "offered to the A's, as widely expected," MLB Commissioner Bud Selig will "have to concede Oakland is doing its part to meet the desires of Fisher, Wolff and certainly MLB" (OAKLAND TRIBUNE, 7/14).
CABLE CARS DERAILED? In S.F., Matier & Ross report, "The exclusive negotiating agreement that the city entered into with JRDV Urban International and its partners to come up with a new home for the Raiders, A's and Warriors is due to expire in September." Sources said that the architectural firm is "looking for as much as another $3 million to continue its share of the work and to add a new partner." Assistant City Administrator Fred Blackwell said that because of "delays in starting the environmental impact report, the designers need an extra year -- but he denies there will be any additional costs associated with the extension." The planning "doesn't seem to have changed the landscape for the A's, who are adamant in their desire to move to San Jose (although that's going nowhere fast), or the Raiders, who always seem to be looking around for a new home (though nobody seems to want them)." The Warriors, "of course, appear to be leaving for San Francisco no matter what." Still, the "planning and spending in Oakland go on" (S.F. CHRONICLE, 7/15).