Arizona State To Build Student-Athlete Center Detroit Approves $450M For Arena Bonds Sacramento Republic FC Purchases Land For Stadium Braves' Naming-Rights Deal Worth $10M Annually Sources: NYC FC Eyes Aqueduct Area Mickelson To Design Calgary Golf Course Facility Notes SunTrust Buys Braves Ballpark Naming Rights Red Wings To Unveil Latest Drawings Of New Arena NFL Supports Commission Of HOF Village
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/July 9, 2013/Facilities
Broncos Unveil New Videoboards; Is Streaming RedZone At NFL Stadiums A Good Idea?
Published July 9, 2013
NEED TO EMPHASIZE STADIUM EXPERIENCE: In Boston, Ben Volin wrote NFL owners need to "start emphasizing what makes the stadium experience great (camaraderie, passion, and live action) and stop trying to emulate the home experience." Owners need to "understand that attending a game in many cities is now a hassle more than anything else." Putting RedZone Channel "on the stadium Jumbotron or building a fantasy football lounge isn’t going to convince most fans to leave their homes or local bars and spend $200, conservatively, on a day at the game." The answer to increasing attendance "seems simple -- lower the prices," and "not just on tickets." The fans will "show up if they feel like they are getting a deal." Instead, it "feels like they’re getting shaken down at the gates" (BOSTON GLOBE, 7/8). PRO FOOTBALL TALK's Mike Florio noted the "potential problem" with running RedZone Channel at stadiums is that if fans are "watching what's going on elsewhere, they inevitably will react to what's going on elsewhere." And that will "make for sounds that don't mesh with what's happening on the field." Maybe "extensive but not continuous use of RedZone is the best way to go." There will be "moments when it makes no sense to distract fans from what's happening on the field" (PROFOOTBALLTALK.com, 7/5).