Emmert Defends Scholarship Values, Insurance Plan UT's Patterson Talks Unionization NCAA OKs Unlimited Meals For Athletes Panel: NCAA Business Model Must Change Areso Bullish On AAC's Post-BCS Future New Bowl Game Set To Debut In Orlando In '15 Northwestern Formally Appeals NLRB's Union Ruling SEC Revenue Up By $41M In '12-13 Calipari Calls Out NCAA In New Book Univ. Of Maryland Marketing Big Ten Move
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/June 3, 2013/Colleges
Rutgers Postpones Hermann Meetings As Job Status Remains Uncertain
Published June 3, 2013
DEVIL'S ADVOCATE: RU Senior VP & General Counsel John Farmer Jr. in a guest column wrote of Hermann, "Look at her record. There is no pervasive pattern of abusive coaching, or insensitive language, or any form of misconduct; there is, instead, a record of pioneering achievement that more than qualifies Hermann to serve as the athletic director of a Big Ten program. ... Hermann has earned this opportunity. She starts June 17. Period" (Newark STAR-LEDGER, 6/2). In N.Y., Lenn Robbins writes Farmer's column "didn't address several pressing questions." Robbins: "Until Hermann and/or Farmer respond to concerns raised by legislators, members of the university’s search committee and alumni, there is no reason to give her or Rutgers, as Farmer wrote, the benefit of the doubt. Period" (N.Y. POST, 6/3). The Newark Star-Ledger's Craig Wolff said "right now it's a confusing picture" as to the status of Hermann. Wolff: “There are lot of mixed signals as to whether a meeting or a bunch of meetings that she was going to have as she starts and gets prepared for her new job, whether those meetings are in fact going happen.” He added, “It speaks in some ways to sort of the culture of sports on a college campus where it's almost two separate worlds between the athletic department and the rest of the university” ("OTL," ESPN, 6/2).
SHORT SHRIFT? The N.Y. POST's Robbins cites sources as saying that Hermann and Wisconsin Deputy AD Sean Frazier, the two finalists for the RU AD job, "went through a rushed and superficial process by the university's search committee that had little to do with being an athletic director." The sources added that the two "went before the 27-person search committee that split into two groups of 10 to 11" over two days. Each candidate "individually went before a group of 10 to 11 for 45 minutes on May 13 and another group on May 14." The sources said that the 10 to 11 committee members "had approximately 45 minutes to ask questions, less than four minutes per committee member." A source said that the "focus of the questions had nothing to do with the role of the athletic director at Rutgers," adding that the questions were "social-issue oriented." The "pace and focus of the search committee was so hurried and superficial, several committee members were frustrated and disheartened" (N.Y. POST, 6/3). Robbins wrote the questioning of Hermann and Frazier was "glaringly dissimilar on at least one highly sensitive issue." A source said that Hermann was "given a free pass on questions regarding the NCAA’s new Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender-Questioning (LGBT-Q) guide," while Frazier was "skewered by questioning so hostile from one member of the Rutgers search committee it necessitated a letter of apology to Frazier" from RU associate professor and search committee member Jeffrey Longhofer. Meanwhile, a source said that the Univ. of Louisville had "canceled a good-bye party for Hermann" (N.Y. POST, 6/2).
CREAM OF THE CROP? N.Y. Daily News columnist Mike Lupica said Rutgers “made it sound as if” Hermann “just blew away the competition, and what I’ve been wondering is how many other of the top candidates were involved in two lawsuits in their resume?” Lupica: “This process has been a sham and a fraud from the start and I can’t believe that somebody on the board doesn’t stand up and say, ‘We’re putting this whole thing on hold and we’re going to start the process all over again.’” ESPN’s Israel Gutierrez said the hiring of Hermann “seemed like an old sleight of hand trick,” but there are “just little things here and there that she is just lying about” (“The Sports Reporters,” ESPN, 6/2).
THE ROAD BACK: In New Jersey, Jerry Carino wrote under the header, "Has The Rutgers University Image Been Tarnished By Scandals?" The school is "paying elite crisis management firm Hill + Knowlton Strategies $150,000 for help" (MYCENTRALJERSEY.com, 6/2). In Newark, Steve Politi writes, "A few smart answers from Hermann at the beginning would have contained the flames, if not put them out entirely, and you didn't have to pay $150,000 to a crisis management company to understand that. You just had to be forthcoming and you had to be good at dealing with the media" (Newark STAR-LEDGER, 6/3). Also in Newark, Heyboer & Luicci wrote there are "growing questions about the impact" the controversy "will all have on the life blood of college sports -- fundraising." Former Rutgers AD Robert Mulcahy said, "I think the biggest challenge for the new athletic director is to heal the community and regain respect. You can't fundraise until you get that back." But some "big-time donors, upset over how Pernetti was treated, may not be easily convinced." Rutgers Univ. Foundation President Carol Herring said, "It is really too hard to tell if this is going to have an effect" (Newark STAR-LEDGER, 6/2). In DC, Sally Quinn wrote of the situation, "We are clearly facing a crisis of morals, ethics and values. ... Have we lost all concept of standards? Does anybody care?" Quinn: "If Hermann is going to uphold Rutgers' core values, it calls into question what exactly the university has as core values" (WASHINGTON POST, 6/1).
WHICH WAY IS UP? ESPNW's Mechelle Voepel wrote under the header, "Rutgers AD Hermann Faces Tough Road." Voepel wrote, "I was familiar with Hermann's work at Louisville before she took the Rutgers position and respected her. I was not aware of the allegations that have since come out, and they didn't fit with my perception of her. I've had to re-evaluate my view but must acknowledge it is still tempered by the positive impression I'd already formed" (ESPNW.com, 6/1). N.Y. Daily News' Bob Raissman said the "adverse publicity is getting so huge" there is "going to be a tipping point where even her supporters are going to have to say, 'We've got to cut bait’” ("Daily News Live," SNY, 5/31).
WATER UNDER THE BRIDGE: Jodee Scott, who played volleyball at the Univ. of Tennessee under Hermann in '95 and '96, in a guest column wrote, "I did not enjoy playing for Julie Hermann, but do not wish her any ill will. No one on that team does." Scott, who along with other former teammates had written a letter expressing their concerns with Hermann while she was their coach at UT, wrote, "I want to be very clear in my support for everything that my teammates have said. The letter existed and was read out loud to Julie Hermann in a meeting with the entire team present. I was there. It happened." However, that "was 16 years ago and that does not mean she won't be a great Athletic Director at Rutgers" (Newark STAR-LEDGER, 6/2).