Monster Energy To Title Top NASCAR Series Monster's Title Sponsor Deal Worth Less Than Sprint's Tiger's Deal With Monster Energy Is Multiyear Toews, Matthews Play "Call Your Shot" In Bauer Video Suarez Talks Being First Foreign NASCAR Champ Ohio State Licenses LeBron James Shoes, Jerseys Jordan Releases Space Jam Shoe Campaign Hy-Vee Cites Costs For Ending Royals Sponsorship Tissot Signs Latest NBA Team Deal With Cavs U.S. Players Promote Adidas Women's Cleats
SBD/April 12, 2013/Marketing and Sponsorship
NASCAR To Take Closer Look At Race Naming Rights As NRA 500 Draws Criticism
Published April 12, 2013
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
WALK THE LINE: Gossage said of the sponsorship, "Our customers are hunters, so demographically, we match up very well. This isn't a political rally. There will be nobody stuffing NRA leaflets in your hand or making any speeches. That's why I say it's a sports marketing platform. It's not a political message platform." USA TODAY's Nate Ryan notes some "national exposure for the NRA will be limited." Though race broadcaster Fox is "contractually obligated to mention the sponsor once an hour, the NRA didn't purchase a premium package to guarantee multiple mentions, graphics and added commercial time." This "won't be the typical marketing platform that is synonymous with NASCAR." The NRA is "playing to its base." NASCAR has a "greater interest than ever in walking a fine political line." NASCAR, whose "lifeblood is corporate largesse, must keep money flowing to teams and facilities while being sensitive to the sport's five-year push to attract new generations of more diverse fans that might not share the values of its hard-core Southern roots" (USA TODAY, 4/12).
PAYING IN FULL: SPORTING NEWS' Pockrass noted race sponsorships for the sport’s "biggest tracks typically cost more" than $1M, and Gossage said the NRA “paid full boat” for the deal. Whether the sponsorship "continues could be determined by the public outcry this week." Gossage: “This isn’t a sponsorship that would work if you were at Sears Point Raceway (near San Francisco). We’re Texas Motor Speedway and I know what works here and what doesn’t. This isn’t an issue here.” Gossage said that it is "mostly the media that has made noise about the NRA sponsorship." Gossage: “It’s just not a big deal to the public" (SPORTINGNEWS.com, 4/11).
STILL ON SCHEDULE: In Ft. Worth, Carlos Mendez notes U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who "wrote to NASCAR questioning the NRA’s sponsorship ... is asking Fox not to televise the race." But Gossage and SMI Chair & CEO Bruton Smith "laughed off the idea." Gossage said, “I think Rupert Murdoch will see it for what it is. I appreciate, personally, a publicity effort -- I really do. That’s two times he’s bit at this apple and gotten himself some publicity both times.” The race will be "televised as scheduled" (FT. WORTH STAR-TELEGRAM, 4/12). The OBSERVER's Utter asks if the race is a "perfect fit for a national TV audience." The NRA has "not purchased any advertising to be aired during the telecast." Utter notes none of Fox’ "current advertisers have pulled out because of the NRA sponsorship, and it is unlikely the issue will be mentioned during the broadcast." Fox Sports Senior VP/Communications Lou D'Ermilio said, "We will honor our contractual obligations to NASCAR" (CHARLOTTE OBSERVER, 4/12).