City Of Oakland Faces Tough Raiders Decision Brady, Goodell Ordered To Appear In Court Orlando City Unveils 25,500-Stadium Plan Seau's Daughter Allowed To Speak At HOF Populous To Design New DC United Stadium Marlins Have Veto Power Over Proposed MLS Stadium Browns' Haslam Endorses Coach, GM 49ers Continue To Have Sod Issues At Levi's Stadium Blackhawks Building New Practice Facility NFLPA Planning To File Special Injunction In Brady Case
SBD/April 11, 2013/Facilities
Voter Referendum Set For Tax Hike To Support Dolphins' Stadium Renovations
Published April 11, 2013
SWIMMING AGAINST THE CURRENT? In Ft. Lauderdale, Craig Davis notes there are “significant hurdles remaining” in securing the Sun Life Stadium upgrades. The Dolphins said that they have “gotten favorable response when they present the merits of the funding plan to community groups.” But there is “considerable opposition among voters who object to giving any public funds to sports teams and wealthy owners such as Dolphins' owner Steve Ross” (South Florida SUN-SENTINEL, 4/11). Former Eagles Owner and South Florida car dealer Norman Braman said that he was “ready to bankroll opposition to the deal in an election, but if he waits for the legislature to vote … he may miss out on opportunity to influence absentee voters” (MIAMI.CBSLOCAL.com, 4/10).
NOTHING FISHY: In Ft. Lauderdale, Dave Hyde writes the Super Bowl is “being used as a political shield and conversational convenience for the Dolphins to get public millions to build their stadium.” The stadium has “legitimate needs for updating, no doubt.” But the “big-money item, the canopy, isn't really needed to shield Super Bowl fans from night-time rain.” It is “necessary to shade Dolphins fans sitting in the heat of a September afternoon.” Hyde writes, “You can't blame the Dolphins for going this route. They're doing what sports teams do in America” (South Florida SUN-SENTINEL, 4/11).