Rooftop Signs Are Sticking Point In Vikings Project 'Dega To Remove Allison Grandstand Churchill Downs Struggles During Fall Meet Wrigley Could Be Allowed To Push Back Wall Ratner Wants Only Entertainment At Coliseum Hub Facility Notes Cal Signs Field Naming-Rights Deal With Kabam CU Approves $143M Facilities Upgrade Plan Spotlight TMS, Ticketmaster Reach Deal Facility Notes
SBD/March 21, 2013/Facilities
Ricketts Family, Chicago Alderman At Loggerheads Over Wrigley Renovation Plans
Published March 21, 2013
LANDMARK CASE: The TRIBUNE's Dardick & Byrne note the center field scoreboard is "protected as a landmark, so to replace it would require the approval of various city bodies, including the Commission on Chicago Landmarks" (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 3/21). In Chicago, Fran Spielman cited sources as saying that if a deal can "still be salvaged," it is "certain to include 'some signage' inside the ballpark and 'some blockage' of rooftop clubs even after attempts to 'minimize' the number of obstructions." Spielman notes Emanuel is "prepared to lift the 30-game-per-season ceiling on the number of night games to 44 or 45 games, with some of the dates reserved for concerts." Six-to-10 3:05 p.m. starts also could "be part of the mix." Spielman: "But none of that will happen before fence-mending" (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 3/21). ESPN CHICAGO's Jon Greenberg regarding the suburb of Rosemont, Ill.'s offer to build the Cubs a new stadium there wrote, "You know it's silly season for the Chicago Cubs' never-ending Wrigley Field saga when someone suggests they move to Rosemont and people take it seriously." Greenberg: "You think the Cubs draw 3 million every year to watch the Chris Rusins of the world? You think all the booze hounds who frequent Wrigley in the summer would be thrilled to jump on the Blue Line?" The Rosemont Cubs idea "isn't a real plan, so I feel dumber for even discussing it." But just to "end the chatter: Baseball teams don't move from the city to the suburbs" (ESPNCHICAGO.com, 3/20).
COSTLY ERRORS? In Chicago, Steve Rosenbloom wrote, "I believe that Tom Ricketts now leads the Chicago Owners League in negotiating errors." Rosemont's offer "came out of nowhere and seemed to be met with suspicion, but remember, things get done in Rosemont." Stuff "gets built there." So you "can’t necessarily rule out the legitimacy of Rosemont’s offer." But you "can officially rule out Ricketts’ viability as a owner who gets what he needs for his business." Ricketts "didn’t play the move card when the family bought the team." Rosenbloom: "In fact, he gave up his greatest negotiating weapon on Day One when he said the family wouldn’t leave Wrigley." Ricketts "had a chance to add to his negotiating game." He "had a chance to speed up a deal with the city even if he faked the whole thing." Rosenbloom: "But no. Ricketts remains the stooge in this case." He "absolutely should’ve taken all the steps toward a new park." Showing serious interest in Rosement would have "drawn a reaction from Cubs fans" (CHICAGOTRIBUNE.com, 3/20).