NFL Undecided On Sensors In Balls For Season Bills Post Second-Best Season-Ticket Sales Mark Isles' Ledecky Touts Progress At Barclays Center Agent Change Leads To Bosa Contract Steelers' Danny Rooney Heir Apparent To His Father? Yankees Look To Refinance $1B In Debt Harbaugh Is Critical On Number Of Preseason Games Twins Restructuring Baseball Operations Could College Success Lead To NFL In Australia? Colts Announcers Make Several Missteps
SBD/March 20, 2013/Franchises
MLB, NFL Remain At Odds Over Scheduling Conflict Between Orioles, Ravens
Published March 20, 2013
LEAVE IT TO THE TEAMS: ESPN’s Michael Wilbon said MLB and the NFL “shouldn’t be involved with this." Wilbon: "Two teams that share the same plot of land ought to have enough goodwill to work this out in their own.” ESPN's Tony Kornheiser said, “If I’m the Orioles, the NFL has to give me something. Steve Bisciotti said he will accommodate them for lost revenues. I got to get a gift bag, I got to get something if I’m going to move out the way.” Wilbon: “Let the Ravens play on Sunday. This whole Thursday thing, let’s not act like it’s Thanksgiving Thursday. This is a tradition of three-and-a-half minutes” (“PTI,” ESPN, 3/19). In Baltimore, Peter Schmuck cites sources as saying that the Ravens "have offered to try and compensate the Orioles for the inconvenience, but that possibility may have been endangered" by comments from NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Ravens officials that "seemed to be aimed at putting the O’s on the defensive, even though this scheduling snafu is not of their making." If that was the "intent, it was brilliantly cynical and manipulative, considering the Orioles are just bouncing back from 14 years worth of bad publicity." The Orioles may yet "agree to some kind of accommodation, but they are under no obligation to do so when moving the game to the afternoon immediately after a travel night for both teams could have an effect -- however subtle -- on the ability to compete for a playoff berth" (Baltimore SUN, 3/20).
TOUGH TO MAKE THE MOVE: In DC, Tracee Hamilton writes she could see MLB "accommodating this request" if the Orioles-White Sox game was "in the midst of a homestand ... at the end of a homestand, or if it followed an off day." But it follows "night games on the road for both teams." Hamilton: "If the Thursday night opener were important, I’d feel differently. But we’re not talking about a postseason game. We’re talking about a faux-opening day." The NFL "cooked up this Thursday night spectacle featuring a pregame of middling rock stars and lots and lots of blather" (WASHINGTON POST, 3/20). In Baltimore, Kevin Cowherd wrote, "I just hope it's not the O's who end up hurting themselves and caving in to the almighty NFL." Having the Orioles "play an earlier day game and the Ravens move back the start of their game that night would be a disaster." Cowherd: "It seems to me the NFL is going to have to accommodate the Orioles on this one" (BALTIMORESUN.com, 3/19). But in DC, Cindy Boren wrote, "If I were Goodell, I'd make another generous offer to compensate [MLB Commissioner Bud] Selig, the Orioles and the White Sox for their trouble -- and it would be my final offer." If Selig "didn't accept it, I'd schedule that Sept. 5 home opener for the Ravens and let nature take its course" (WASHINGTONPOST.com, 3/19). NBC Sports Network’s Michelle Beadle said, "You’ve got TV for both sides for the baseball side. You’ve got teams coming in, you can’t just switch it all willy nilly.” But Beadle later said, "My reaction is that obviously football should come first." NBC Sports Net's Dave Briggs: "The NFL will get their way" ("The Crossover," NBCSN, 3/19).