Kentucky Adding Ribbon Boards At Rupp Facility Notes "SNF" Leads Primetime For Fourth Time Many Indifferent Toward New Extra Point Rule Goodell Open To New Info From Brady Deflategate Affects Brady's Endorsement Value Oakland Stadium Efforts "Going Backward" NFL Could Hear Relocation Requests In Late '15 Blue Bell Name Not Coming Off A&M Ballpark Mexico, Germany Could Host NFL Games
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/January 14, 2013/Facilities
Georgia Lawmakers: Falcons Need Better Plan To Win Support For New Stadium
Published January 14, 2013
OVER-ARCHING ISSUES: In St, Louis, David Hunn in a front-page piece noted the Rams and the St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission have been at a “stalemate for months over renovations required by the team’s 30-year lease.” Three arbitrators today will “begin to hammer out answers.” They will “choose between three alternatives: the CVC’s renovation proposal, valued at least at $124 million; the Rams’ much pricier option; or a plan the arbitrators create themselves.” If CVC leaders “find the end result too expensive, they could let the Rams’ lease go year-to-year beginning in 2015.” If the Rams “find the renovations too minimal, they could buy their way out,” which “opens the doors for new ideas, new places -- and a new stadium.” A top Rams exec indicated that, while the team “wants to stay in the region, it isn’t set on the Dome.” Hunn noted Rams execs “won’t talk about their intentions,” but a few things “are clear.” Rams Owner Stan Kroenke “generally likes owning his teams’ stadiums.” Additionally, the renovations he is requesting for the Dome “approach the cost of a new stadium.” The renovations also “wouldn’t solve one of the team’s thorniest problems: the Rams don’t own any of the surrounding parking lots” (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 1/13).