Wrigley Upgrades Facing Aggressive Timeline NFL, DirecTV Extend NFL Sunday Ticket Plans For United Center Lot Still Undecided Facility Notes NFL Owners To Talk About Exempt List Players Brain Bank Finds CTE Increase In Former NFLers NFL Pushes Ahead On Breast Cancer Initiatives Tustin Wants To Recoup Angels Ballpark Investment New Maple Leaf Square Name Skips Confusion FCC Could Ban Stations From Using "Redskins"
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/January 14, 2013/Facilities
Georgia Lawmakers: Falcons Need Better Plan To Win Support For New Stadium
Published January 14, 2013
OVER-ARCHING ISSUES: In St, Louis, David Hunn in a front-page piece noted the Rams and the St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission have been at a “stalemate for months over renovations required by the team’s 30-year lease.” Three arbitrators today will “begin to hammer out answers.” They will “choose between three alternatives: the CVC’s renovation proposal, valued at least at $124 million; the Rams’ much pricier option; or a plan the arbitrators create themselves.” If CVC leaders “find the end result too expensive, they could let the Rams’ lease go year-to-year beginning in 2015.” If the Rams “find the renovations too minimal, they could buy their way out,” which “opens the doors for new ideas, new places -- and a new stadium.” A top Rams exec indicated that, while the team “wants to stay in the region, it isn’t set on the Dome.” Hunn noted Rams execs “won’t talk about their intentions,” but a few things “are clear.” Rams Owner Stan Kroenke “generally likes owning his teams’ stadiums.” Additionally, the renovations he is requesting for the Dome “approach the cost of a new stadium.” The renovations also “wouldn’t solve one of the team’s thorniest problems: the Rams don’t own any of the surrounding parking lots” (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 1/13).