NHRA Looks For Growth In '16 Season NHL Opposing Concussion Claims By Player Spouses Rams In Talks To Hold Camp At UC Irvine Global Poker League Targets Young Audience Borders Ready For WNBA Challenge Caddies Lose Lawsuit Against PGA Tour Exam Shows Late NHLer Ewen Did Not Have CTE Foley Surprised At NHL Expansion Process Columnist: Combine Move Just "More PR Spin" Sources: George Speirs Out As NWHL COO
SBD/December 28, 2012/Leagues and Governing Bodies
Seahawks' Sherman Wins Suspension Appeal On Irregularities In NFL Drug-Testing Procedure
Published December 28, 2012
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW CONCLUSIONS? In Seattle, Steve Kelley writes athletes "hardly ever win these appeals," and when they "do, there is the presumption of guilt, as if they somehow scammed the system and got off on a technicality." Sherman, asked if he cared about the perception of some that he is guilty, said, "The truth has been told today, and people can say what they want. There's always naysayers. There were a lot of mistakes made, on top of me never taking anything" (SEATTLE TIMES, 12/28). However, USA TODAY's Jarrett Bell writes winning in this case "does not mean Sherman is squeaky clean." Sherman won "on a technicality." Bell: "Nowhere in arbitrator Bob Wallace's decision was it stated that Sherman's sample wasn't legit." Sherman "played by the rules of the NFL's drug policy and shifted the burden to the process and the collector, Mark Cook." Sherman won, but to a "larger degree, the league lost on one bad positive test" (USA TODAY, 12/28).