Classified Advertisements Runner's World Publisher Talks Boston Marathon UFC Projected To Sell Out In Orlando Emmert Defends Scholarship Values, Insurance Plan New Bucks Owners Open To Local Investors Bengals, County Reach Stadium Upgrades Deal Bettman Praises Shanahan's League Office Work Dierdorf Joins Michigan Booth For Football Louisville, Adidas Ink Five-Year Extension SBJ In-Depth: Action Sports
SBD/November 16, 2012/Leagues and Governing BodiesPrint All
NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman on Wednesday night suggested to NHLPA Exec Dir Donald Fehr that the two sides "take a two-week moratorium from negotiations," according to Katie Strang of ESPN N.Y. A source said that Fehr informed Bettman he would "like to speak with his membership first." The union likely will "give Bettman a response Friday, although it is believed it would prefer meeting rather than not." Bettman's suggestion "follows a disheartening week of limited communication between the sides." NHL Deputy Commissioner Billy Daly in an e-mail said, "I find it incredible that the Union is suggesting that we are somehow 'close' to a deal." NHLPA Special Counsel Steve Fehr responded, "We believe it is more likely that we will make progress if we meet than if we don't." Daly said, "I'm more discouraged now than I have been at any point in the process" (ESPNNY.com, 11/15). USA TODAY's Kevin Allen notes Bettman made the suggestion because "neither side seems to know where to go next in the stalemated negotiations." Daly: "Maybe a break might give both sides a chance to asses where we are" (USA TODAY, 11/16). Daly added, "I think the process is stalled right now. We are done with making proposals and we don't have any new ideas. I guess we will wait to see if the PA has anything to offer that would get us interested in returning to the table. It's unfortunate" (LATIMES.com, 11/15).
WHAT NEXT? In N.Y., Jeff Klein noted there are "no talks scheduled and more game cancellations imminent." The "biggest gap" is in player contract rights, where Bettman "has not budged from his original proposals, which would limit contract lengths and increase the playing time requirements for achieving free agency and salary arbitration." Players on Thursday "missed the third biweekly paycheck they would have received" (NYTIMES.com, 11/15). The CP's Chris Johnston wrote, "Pessimism has grown while losses have started to mount" (CP, 11/15). In N.Y., Pat Leonard notes the NHL is "days away from canceling at least part of its December schedule" (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 11/16). SPORTSBUSINESS JOURNAL's Chris Botta on Wednesday night tweeted, "Source: if there isn't a deal in place in next 7days, NHL will cancel games thru Dec. 15. Next cancellation could be the season." (TWITTER.com, 11/14). CSNPHILLY.com's Tim Panaccio wrote a two-week break in talks "is truly bizarre, but it also explains why there haven't been negotiating sessions this week" (CSNPHILLY.com, 11/15). The GLOBE & MAIL's James Mirtle writes, "Sure it's dark. And yes they're angry at one another and not talking. But to say there hasn't been any progress in the last eight weeks (or even two weeks) is just flat out wrong" (GLOBE & MAIL, 11/16).
WINNERS & LOSERS: The N.Y. DAILY NEWS' Leonard writes Daly has been "honest throughout these negotiations." It is "difficult not to take him at his word, even if the same cannot be said about Bettman and his 30 silenced enforcers." The NHL has "mishandled several pivotal junctures of these negotiations." The players, "in a sense, are winning" (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 11/16). CSNNE.com's Joe Haggerty writes the more the NHL "tries to show they're not reaching a level of desperation, the more they awkwardly reveal just how desperate they're actually becoming." The suggestion for a two-week moratorium is a move that "reeked of weakness and 'last resort mode' in their Bob Batterman-approved lockout playbook." The NHL has "proven amazingly inept during this whole lockout process." The league needs to allow Bruins Owner and NHL BOG Chair Jeremy Jacobs to "step up and take some level of credit for brokering a deal with the players that ended the lockout rather than his current role as JJ the lockout bus driver" (CSNNE.com, 11/16). ESPN.com's Pierre LeBrun wrote it is "too late to declare anybody a winner no matter how this plays out." Both sides "will be declared losers." Owners "don't want to move an inch at this point." They are "furious that their $211 million 'make whole' offer was rebuffed so easily." Donald Fehr is getting the league "to move on key issues such as revenue sharing and is keeping his players on board through it all." LeBrun: "Unless I'm completely misreading the tea leaves, I can't think of very many NHL players who are willing to sacrifice an entire season of hockey just so they can make a point to commissioner Gary Bettman. ... but if I'm an NHL player, I demand that Fehr cut his losses over the next 2-3 weeks and try to make the best deal possible from what's left on the table." One NHL owner said that if next weekend "comes and goes without a tentative deal, then it might be too late to save the season" (ESPN.com, 11/15). CNBC’s Seema Mody said the lockout is “causing problems” for NHL sponsors, Molson Coors, and financial firm Morningstar “calls the lockout a ‘short term headwind’ for Molson’s Q4 earnings but expects its long-term sales will be restored once players return on ice” (“Fast Money,” CNBC, 11/15).
TIME TO ALTER THE APPROACH? YAHOO SPORTS' Greg Wyshynski wrote it is "clear the Fehr's tactics -- refusing to negotiate off the NHL's framework, for example -- have pushed the NHL to the point where they need to burn a timeout." There is "real concern" that Fehr's "stalling tactics, while effective, may push this thing past the brink" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 11/15). In Toronto, Damien Cox notes Fehr "can't control what is said by former NHL players." The dynamic this week "changed to a degree, with former players Mark Recchi and Chris Therien suggesting players may want to at the very least question the direction in which Fehr is taking the union and the tactics being used." Therien wrote on Twitter, "I'm not saying Don Fehr doesn't have a plan B but if I'm a player again now I'm calling on that 'always available' line to find out." Cox writes it is a "sensitive area for the union." The issue now is "whether the players are making the decisions or whether they are simply following Fehr's lead" (TORONTO STAR, 11/16). Retired NHLer and former NHLPA ombudsman Eric Lindros said, "There's nothing the players are getting out of this (prospective) agreement. They're giving. It's just how much are they going to give. I'm a bit frustrated with it" (WINNIPEG SUN, 11/16). CSNBayArea.com’s Kevin Kurz said, “The owners are insisting that the maximum contract is five years and there isn't too much of a discrepancy in the money between the first and final year of the deal so right now it looks like the NHL is holding firm on that. I can tell you a lot of players think that the NHL just has this timeline in their own mind and they haven't put their best offer on the table yet.” San Jose Mercury News columnist Mark Purdy: “It's almost now becoming personal between Donald Fehr and some of these guys in the ownership group. I think there is a feeling among the owners that, ‘We're not going to let Donald Fehr do to us what he did to the baseball owners’” (“Chronicle Live,” Comcast SportsNet Bay Area, 11/15).
NOT YET PENNY-PINCHING: USA TODAY's Allen in a separate piece noted the players have "now technically already lost 19.4% of their 2012-13 pay." But that figure "isn't permanently settled." What players would "receive in a shortened season still would have to be negotiated" (USA TODAY, 11/16). In Pittsburgh, Dave Molinari writes most players "presumably didn't feel any immediate sting" when the lockout "prevented them from receiving their third check" of the '12-13 season Thursday. Penguins LW Pascal Dupuis said, "At this point of this lockout, I hope nobody's hurting for money. We got an escrow check back from last year, and we're making enough money to, hopefully, not be in financial trouble right now" (PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE, 11/16).
MLB Commissioner Bud Selig on Thursday said the proposed trade between the Blue Jays and Marlins is now under league review, though it has yet to be formally submitted. Selig following quarterly owners meetings in Chicago said there is no timetable for a decision, though he said he was "very sensitive" to the concerns of Marlins fans regarding the departure of many veteran players. Selig: "I want to think about this and review it. I want to be my usual painstaking, cautious, slow, conservative self in analyzing this. … There are a lot of variables. The questions regarding the Marlins fans are very fair and it's a question I'm extremely sensitive to. I'm aware of the anger." He added he "talked to two independent baseball people who tell me the Marlins did very well" in the trade in pure player and roster development terms. Marlins Owner Jeffrey Loria and Blue Jays President & CEO Paul Beeston left the meetings without comment. The commissioner added he was not concerned about the trade and unrest over the Marlins' publicly financed ballpark potentially harming future stadium deals. Selig: "Every one of these situations has its own indigenous characteristics" (Eric Fisher, SportsBusiness Journal).
UNION INTEREST: In Miami, Clark Spencer writes the commissioner's office is "not the only concerned entity" in this trade. The MLBPA also is "keeping a close eye on the situation in Miami and, in particular, the Marlins' payroll." The Marlins a few years ago "signed an agreement promising to increase payroll when concerns were raised by the union that the team wasn't using its revenue-sharing money on salaries." The union has "already been in contact with the league about the Marlins' latest sell-off" (MIAMI HERALD, 11/16).
SENSE OF BETRAYAL: In N.Y., Ben Strauss notes Selig "gave no indication that he had plans to block the trade, saying there was no such precedent." Still, a sense of "betrayal exists in Miami" after Loria "promised a new way forward for the former Florida Marlins with a new stadium, new uniforms and a new name last year." Other small-market owners were "reluctant to say where they stood on the pending trade." Brewers Owner Mark Attanasio said, "Every team makes their own decisions on how they handle things." Rays Owner Stuart Sternberg said, "You can't sustain success as a small market team. You do the best you can" (N.Y. TIMES, 11/16). CBSSPORTS.com's Jon Heyman cited sources as saying that the Marlins' trade "wasn't discussed in the full group" at the owners meeting. A source said that Loria "ate alone in the lunch room Wednesday, and didn't converse with the owners." He did "dine with other owners at breakfast on Thursday." However, he "requested and received an escort to accompany him to breakfast" (CBSSPORTS.com, 11/15).
APPROVE OR DENY? USA TODAY's Bob Nightengale writes Selig "just can't stop this trade." Nightengale: "He knows it. The owners know it. But hopefully Loria is so clueless that he doesn't know it." Loria "isn't selling his players and is even paying the Blue Jays" $8M. This "really isn't a bad baseball trade for the Marlins" and it "might even turn out as a stroke of genius." The Marlins have "one of the best front-office staffs and the finest scouts in the business." It is just the "timing is terrible, considering Loria's history of similar salary dumps" (USA TODAY, 11/16). NBCSPORTS.com's Craig Calcaterra wrote Selig is "excellent at communicating his awareness that something controversial has happened." But "rarely, if ever ... does he wade into things and blow them up" (NBCSPORTS.com, 11/15). Baseball writer Murray Chass wrote, "Selig doesn't like to become involved in a team's business, certainly not where players are involved." Unless rules are "being broken, that is." Loria "may not be breaking rules, but he has shattered the trust and the bond that have to exist between a team and its fans." If fans "act on their feelings, Marlins Park will be empty next season." Loria "deserves that much" (MURRAYCHASS.com, 11/15). ESPN's J.A. Adande said, "Commissioner intervention is a slippery slope. Ask David Stern." But columnist Kevin Blackistone said "absolutely" Selig should "look into it, that's why he's the commissioner." Blackistone: "Best interest of baseball when you have taxpayers on the hook for 80 percent of a half-billion dollar stadium and you just sold off everybody on the team except for the guy selling popcorn, are you kidding me? You better look into this" ("Around The Horn," ESPN, 11/15).
PROBLEMS FOR SOUTH FLORIDA: In DC, Thomas Boswell writes, "The cities that don't win often lose big." Miami "backloaded its debt for its new park." Boswell added, "MLB to Miami: Good luck with that, citizens. It's amazing what you can do with a sanctioned monopoly and Soprano ethics" (WASHINGTON POST, 11/16). In N.Y., Ken Davidoff writes, "The bet here is that Selig would be far happier to say 'See ya!' to Loria than he was to [Mets Owner] Fred Wilpon, for reasons beyond friendship" (N.Y. POST, 11/16). In L.A., Bill Shaikin wrote, "Loria is doing his best to kill baseball in Miami," and MLB "ought to take the team away from him before he can" (LATIMES.com, 11/15).