Minnesota Officials Critique Stadium Roles NFL In L.A. Looking More Likely Than Ever No Stadium Plans Yet For Minnesota United St. Pete City Council To Vote On New Rays Deal Epstein On Wrigley Renovations: "Have Patience" Brewers Renovate Deck Seating, Add Sponsor Facility Notes Unions, Inglewood NFL Developers Reach Deal Bucks Developing Master Plan For New Arena Reds Install Self-Ordering Kiosks
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/November 15, 2012/Facilities
Published November 15, 2012
GRIDIRON GRIDLOCK: In Pasadena, Brian Charles cited an Environmental Impact Report as saying that Pasadena residents "opposed to temporary use of the Rose Bowl by the NFL expressed worries about traffic, booze and rowdy fans." In letters written in response to the EIR, "critics questioned how the Rose Bowl Operating Co. and Pasadena could measure the impact of an NFL team given the differences between the respective fan bases of professional and college football teams." Pasadena City Manager Michael Beck on Tuesday "defended the environmental report." He said that before a franchise "finds its way to the Rose Bowl, the city and the team would have a long discussion about 'fan behavior expectations'" (PASADENA STAR NEWS, 11/14).
WHO WILL BE THE BOSS? In Hartford, Kenneth Gosselin noted "at least five proposals are expected for managing" the XL Center and Rentschler Field. The entities are: AEG Management CT; The Capital Region Sports and Entertainment Group; Global Spectrum; Harbor Yard Sports & Entertainment; and SMG Worldwide. The bids "are due Dec. 17" (HARTFORD COURANT, 11/14).
GETTING HIS PRIORITIES STRAIGHT: In N.Y., Sally Goldenberg noted N.Y. Mayor Michael Bloomberg's administration has "carefully crafted a special list of high-profile priority projects to fast-track before Bloomberg’s third term ends in 14 months." Those projects include "a Major League Soccer stadium in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park" and a USTA "expansion of the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center." One high-ranking city official said that all other "land-use proposals are getting completely ignored because the administration will not take on anything outside of its priorities" (N.Y. POST, 11/13).