Verizon, Lions Make Upgrades To Wi-Fi At Ford Field Wilkens On Panel To Explore Renovating KeyArena Facility Notes First Data Lands Rights To Mets' Fla. Complex Orlando City Lacks Stadium Naming-Rights Partner San Diego Developer Proposing SoccerCity Alternative Virginia Tech AD Discusses Facility Upgrades Vail Resorts Acquires Vermont's Stowe Mountain Bucks' New Video Board Goes Against NBA Grain Manfred Defends D-Backs' Chase Field Stance
SBD/November 15, 2012/Facilities
Published November 15, 2012
GRIDIRON GRIDLOCK: In Pasadena, Brian Charles cited an Environmental Impact Report as saying that Pasadena residents "opposed to temporary use of the Rose Bowl by the NFL expressed worries about traffic, booze and rowdy fans." In letters written in response to the EIR, "critics questioned how the Rose Bowl Operating Co. and Pasadena could measure the impact of an NFL team given the differences between the respective fan bases of professional and college football teams." Pasadena City Manager Michael Beck on Tuesday "defended the environmental report." He said that before a franchise "finds its way to the Rose Bowl, the city and the team would have a long discussion about 'fan behavior expectations'" (PASADENA STAR NEWS, 11/14).
WHO WILL BE THE BOSS? In Hartford, Kenneth Gosselin noted "at least five proposals are expected for managing" the XL Center and Rentschler Field. The entities are: AEG Management CT; The Capital Region Sports and Entertainment Group; Global Spectrum; Harbor Yard Sports & Entertainment; and SMG Worldwide. The bids "are due Dec. 17" (HARTFORD COURANT, 11/14).
GETTING HIS PRIORITIES STRAIGHT: In N.Y., Sally Goldenberg noted N.Y. Mayor Michael Bloomberg's administration has "carefully crafted a special list of high-profile priority projects to fast-track before Bloomberg’s third term ends in 14 months." Those projects include "a Major League Soccer stadium in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park" and a USTA "expansion of the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center." One high-ranking city official said that all other "land-use proposals are getting completely ignored because the administration will not take on anything outside of its priorities" (N.Y. POST, 11/13).