First Data Lands Rights To Mets' Fla. Complex Orlando City Lacks Stadium Naming-Rights Partner San Diego Developer Proposing SoccerCity Alternative Virginia Tech AD Discusses Facility Upgrades Vail Resorts Acquires Vermont's Stowe Mountain Bucks' New Video Board Goes Against NBA Grain Manfred Defends D-Backs' Chase Field Stance Blue Jays Debate Rogers Renovation Themes Millennial Esports Opening Gaming Arena In Vegas Plans Released For San Diego's "SoccerCity"
SBD/October 16, 2012/Facilities
Liverpool Plans Multi-Million Dollar Anfield Redevelopment, Increasing Capacity To 60,000
Published October 16, 2012
NUTS & BOLTS: In London, Tony Barrett reports Liverpool intends to "use existing banking facilities to finance" the redevelopment of Anfield, which Ayre "insists will not have a negative impact on their ability to compete in the transfer market." With naming rights "dismissed as a non-starter for Anfield, FSG will borrow the money to provide the necessary finance to increase the stadium's capacity." Liverpool is expected to "submit a planning application early next summer and they will do so with the support" of Anderson, who "believes that the trust and leadership needed to bring the club's 12-year stadium saga to an end is now in place." Anderson said, "The difference between dealing with the administration of the club now and dealing with the previous owners (Tom Hicks and George Gillett) is like chalk and cheese. There's an element of trust and collaboration now" (LONDON TIMES, 10/16). BLOOMBERG NEWS' Tariq Panja noted Liverpool had "previously ruled out enlarging Anfield, citing difficulties in getting planning consent." The stadium is located "amid a maze of row houses in one of the city’s poorest neighborhoods" (BLOOMBERG NEWS, 10/15). The AP's Rob Harris noted work on a new $800M venue in nearby Stanley Park started in '08 but "was put on hold" by Hicks and Gillett "due to financial shortfalls" (AP, 10/15).
WORK WITH WHAT YOU GOT: In N.Y., Steven Cotton writes, "To those who view Anfield as their spiritual home, it makes perfect sense." The Anfield redevelopment project "may go some way" to defining the legacy of FSG Chair John Henry "among Liverpool supporters and in English soccer as a whole." Liverpool "has yet to confirm the capacity of the new-look Anfield, but the consensus seems to be that it will grow by about 15,000 from its current size." The "obvious need for growth is offset by an equally clear desire to protect the heritage of a site that has been the club’s only home since its formation in 1892." Previous owners of Liverpool have "tried, and failed, to redevelop the stadium because the needs of the local community were not met or respected." The difference "this time, it seems, is that there is finally a willingness from all parties to work together, with a wider regeneration of the area -- not just the stadium -- now planned." There is "genuine hope that Anfield can now follow a blueprint that worked so well at Fenway Park," as Henry "has proved he can strike a balance between sentiment and modernization" (N.Y. TIMES, 10/16).