Will Retirement Affect Beckham's Brand Appeal? Michigan: No Plans For Alternate Unis In '13 EA, Amazon Team On "Madden" Promo NBC Already 75% Sold Out For Sochi Games Mayweather Tops SI's Fortunate 50 List Ortiz Selling Bats To Benefit Bombing Victims SHR Signs Deal With State Water Heaters Shaq Signs Deal With Arizona Beverage Sherwin-Williams' NASCAR Deal Begins Today Motocross Team Pushes Sponsor Categories
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/August 23, 2012/Marketing and Sponsorship
Controversy Over $300 LeBron Shoes Continues; Is Nike Sending Wrong Message?
Published August 23, 2012
NUMBERS GAME: In Las Vegas, Ed Graney writes, "The fact that an athlete's shoe is flirting with the once unimaginable price of $300 shouldn't send shock waves through anyone's wallet." If it "knows anything, Nike understands the math on this stuff." Nike owns 95% of the basketball shoe market in the U.S., and "retail for its hoop shoes costing more than $100 is up 50 percent." Graney: "I blame James for the ridiculous price and I don't. I get it. The power of capitalism. The basic supply-and-demand strategy" (LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, 8/23). However, CNBC’s Julia Boorstin said, “The problem is marketing and that Nike is marketing these shoes to teenagers and often to teenagers in inner-cities who can’t afford them. I think that Nike does pride itself on its corporate responsibility, they just have to be really cautious how they handle the marketing issue” ("Power Lunch," CNBC, 8/22).