Jack Link's Gets Creative With Draft Exposure Adams, Davis Make Fashion Statements At Draft Nike, Under Armour, Adidas Not Interested In Lonzo Ball Nationwide Assessing Earnhardt Jr. Sponsorship Danica Continues Sponsorships With Non-Profits Municipal Credit Union Signs With NFL Jets James, Carter Recount Turning Down Reebok FedEx Signs Multiyear NFL Extension Woods' Endorsement Deals Suffer From Layoff NFL Players Inc. Moves Ride-Share Deal To Lyft
Upcoming Conferences and Events
May 31 - Jun 1
SBD/August 23, 2012/Marketing and Sponsorship
Controversy Over $300 LeBron Shoes Continues; Is Nike Sending Wrong Message?
Published August 23, 2012
NUMBERS GAME: In Las Vegas, Ed Graney writes, "The fact that an athlete's shoe is flirting with the once unimaginable price of $300 shouldn't send shock waves through anyone's wallet." If it "knows anything, Nike understands the math on this stuff." Nike owns 95% of the basketball shoe market in the U.S., and "retail for its hoop shoes costing more than $100 is up 50 percent." Graney: "I blame James for the ridiculous price and I don't. I get it. The power of capitalism. The basic supply-and-demand strategy" (LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, 8/23). However, CNBC’s Julia Boorstin said, “The problem is marketing and that Nike is marketing these shoes to teenagers and often to teenagers in inner-cities who can’t afford them. I think that Nike does pride itself on its corporate responsibility, they just have to be really cautious how they handle the marketing issue” ("Power Lunch," CNBC, 8/22).