Boston '24 Execs Endorse Referendum Over Games Boston Mayor's Backers Mobilize For '24 NBC Plans Three Days Of On-Site EPL Coverage Boston '24 Looking For Majority Support Poll: Public Support For '24 Games Slips Further USOC Brass Preach Patience In '24 Bid Boston '24 Has Rough Week Fish Defends Boston '24 Hiring Patrick Boston '24's Patrick Getting $7,500 Daily "PBC" Results Mixed After Debut
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/August 13, 2012/Olympics
NBC Execs Defend Broadcast Model, Say Live Streaming May Have Helped Draw Viewers
Published August 13, 2012
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
STREAMING LIKELY HELPED MORE THAN HURT: NBC London Olympics Exec Producer Jim Bell said the party line going into the Games was that the net "didn’t think live streaming would hurt prime time." and if anything, it "helped prime time." Bell said, "We took a big, bold swing. It worked out in itself and helped the foundation of the house -- prime time.” USA TODAY’s Michael Hiestand writes prior to the Games, NBC’s “public comments were vaguely optimistic about whether its London ratings would top its Beijing numbers.” Bell said, “I thought no way. No way! Honest to God in my heart of hearts. Nobody, not anybody in NBC and probably nobody outside, thought it would match Beijing.” Hiestand notes Bell “won’t rule out that NBC, which has the Games through 2020, might someday show more events live and then air them again in prime time.” But Bell said that primetime “remains a very important property.” Bell: “It’s important to re-emphasize that a lot of the viewing public doesn’t know about these sports” (USA TODAY, 8/13). In Tampa, Tom Jones writes no matter how NBC covered these Games, “there was going to be criticism.” Going forward, the network's “best philosophy should be this: When in doubt, show it live.” And if “it's a big enough event, show it again in prime time” (TAMPA BAY TIMES, 8/13).
SOCIAL MEDIA EXPERIMENT: In L.A., Mary McNamara writes NBC “did more than broadcast an international sporting event -- it conducted a grand and sweeping media experiment that will have repercussions in programming and coverage for years to come.” The multi-layered system of coverage -- “live Web streaming and NBC's family of cable channels during the day with certain events held for prime time viewing -- appeared not just complicated but greedy: We will show you the events you most want to see long after they have occurred because that's how we make money.” While delivering the Olympics live via other platforms, NBC “used its prime-time coverage to curate the Games, to create an Olympic experience that both echoed the past -- when families actually gathered 'round the electronic hearth -- and visualized the future, in which the entertainment value of televised theater is considered separately from the twists of its plot lines.” But the “shortcomings of craft are not as important as the long-term implications of intent: to give the viewers the best of both worlds” (L.A. TIMES, 8/13). USA TODAY’s Robert Bianco offered some tips to NBC to “make 2016 a happier experience all around.” It “wouldn’t hurt sportscasters to remember that every defeat is not tragic, every victory is not historic, and every athlete is not heroic.” In Rio, NBC should “hire an actual Brazilian instead, an expert to introduce us to our largest and most populous southern neighbor.” And “keep up the good work.” Bianco: “That’s not sarcasm. We can take for granted how many difficult things NBC does well” (USA TODAY, 8/13).