UA To Launch Female-Focused Ads NFLPA Blames League For HGH Impasse HOF Expects Crowd Of 40,000 Panthers, Jaguars To Unveil Upgrades Sources: EverBank, Jags Set For Extension Paul: I'll Sit Out If Sterling Still In Control Johnson Leads In NASCAR TV Exposure TWC, SEC Net Reach Carriage Deal Executive Transactions F1 Race In New Jersey Delayed Again
SBD/July 31, 2012/FacilitiesPrint All
The Metropolitan King County Council yesterday "approved a plan for a new sports arena," but the Seattle City Council told arena investor Chris Hansen that it "wouldn't move forward unless some of the tax revenue is used for improvements to traffic and freight mobility in Sodo,” according to a front-page piece by Thompson & Young of the SEATTLE TIMES. The City Council also “held out hope that successful negotiations with Hansen could be wrapped up within a week, clearing the way for a majority of council members to approve a deal in August" to build a new $490M arena with $200M in public financing. The King County Council “approved the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Hansen by a 6-3 vote.” The MOU is “legally binding and sets a framework for a final deal that would be hammered out by the county, city and Hansen.” The agreement now must “get approval from the City Council, which has been more critical” (SEATTLE TIMES, 7/31). The AP’s Tim Booth wrote if the Seattle City Council’s actions are any indication, the arena plan has “plenty of adjustments and changes yet to come.” Eight of nine Seattle council members “unveiled a letter to Hansen saying changes must be made to the proposal before they could support it.” Traffic concerns in the Sodo neighborhood -- where Safeco Field, CenturyLink Field and the Port of Seattle “all share limited space -- have been at the core of arguments against Hansen's plan” (AP, 7/30).
PLAY NICE: In Seattle, Jerry Brewer writes, “To his credit, Hansen has sought fair from the beginning, and he has pledged $290 million of private money to prove it." That is why Hansen "has made it this far, because his group's willingness to pay for nearly 60 percent of a $490 million arena is a stunning commitment in modern-day pro sports business.” Brewer: "If you're for the arena and have been impressed by the measures Hansen took upfront to make this a good deal for both parties, then it's impossible to resist outrage that the city council is asking Hansen to fix too many of the city's problems.” The city council had “better be careful with this negotiation.” It would be "negligent and unfair for the city council to ram a deal through without concern and some level of mitigation for traffic and freight mobility in Sodo." It also would be "foolish and unfair to toss away such a sweet deal from Hansen simply because of an issue that he didn't create.” Hansen is “willing to do his part,” but his group “won’t be a magic ATM” (SEATTLE TIMES, 7/31).
Atlanta residents “overwhelmingly oppose the use of hotel-motel tax revenue to finance a new stadium for the Falcons,” according to poll results cited by Tim Tucker of the ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION. The Falcons are “deep into negotiations with the Georgia World Congress Center Authority ... about a potential deal in which hotel-motel taxes would be part of the financing plan for a downtown, retractable-roof stadium to replace the Georgia Dome.” But a poll conducted last week by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research found that 67% of metro Atlantans “disapprove of using such funds for the stadium.” Twenty-three percent of those polled said that they “approve of using hotel-motel tax money on the stadium," while the remaining 10% were "unsure.” The result showed that disapproval was "expressed by 75 percent of men, 61 percent of women, 59 percent of Democrats, 71 percent of Republicans and 70 percent of independents.” The GWCC said that under the plan being negotiated, the “occupancy tax on Fulton County hotel-motel rooms would cover an estimated" $300M of the stadium cost, and that the Falcons "would be responsible for the rest” (ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION, 7/30).