Mid-Majors Face Cost-Of-Attendance Choices Outgoing Mizzou AD Reflects On 17-Year Tenure Stones Concert Could Help Georgia Tech Budget Texas Raising Men's Hoops Tix Prices Army Rebrands, Unveils New Logo Arizona State Gets Credibility With Hurley NCAA's Luck Discusses Issues With Vaccaro Oregon Men's Basketball Dropping Ticket Prices NCAA Frozen Four Returns To Boston Nebraska-Omaha Hockey Gains Momentum
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/July 25, 2012/Colleges
Emmert Claims Penn State Scandal Demanded That NCAA Act In Some Way
Published July 25, 2012
THEY GOT IT WRONG: In Baltimore, Chris Korman writes the NCAA's "unprecedented sanctioning of the football team -- doled out by president Mark Emmert himself -- solves nothing." If anything, it "reinforces the wrong message: that football matters." Emmert "came to the NCAA throne seeking a signature decision to mark him as a man who cares about the sanctity of so-called amateurism in college athletics." But if he is "of the honest belief that hurting Penn State's chances of winning football games for a few years somehow solidified his role as the true enforcer of what the NCAA stands for, he has apparently missed the whole point entirely" (BALTIMORESUN.com, 7/24). ESPN.com's Tim Keown wrote there is "only one honest way to look at the punishments slapped on Penn State: The NCAA set out to create a losing program, and it went about the task systematically, with all the subtlety of a watermelon being tossed from the back of a moving pickup." This "wasn't reform; this was after-the-fact, frontier-style revenge." It would have been "neater and more humane to have imposed a one-year death penalty on the Penn State program -- and that's exactly why the NCAA didn't do it" (ESPN.com, 7/24).
HAD TO DO SOMETHING: CBS' Jim Rome said, “There are plenty of things that the NCAA has gotten wrong, but this is not one of them. There was no way the NCAA could sit this one out.” Rome said if the NCAA did not levy penalties against PSU, the organization “would have even less credibility and legitimacy" than they have now (“Rome,” CBS Sports Network, 7/24). ESPN’s Rod Gilmore said, “The NCAA’s very relevance was somewhat at stake here.” Ley said to Gilmore, “Are you saying in ... a very perverse sense this is almost a good opportunity for the NCAA to stand up and take an uncontroversial position ... to the benefit of our image?” Gilmore: “Yes it is” ("Penn State: The Price of Scandal," ESPN, 7/24).
THE SLIPPERY SLOPE: In L.A., Baxter Holmes writes, "The NCAA has done more than hammer the Penn State football program with crippling sanctions. It has entered the crime business." In past situations in which athletics and criminal activity "intertwined, the NCAA got involved only after its rules had been violated." Whether the NCAA "overstepped its bounds in the Penn State case has been debated." Florida-based attorney Michael Buckner, who has represented schools in infractions cases, said that the NCAA's actions with Penn State "mark a 'slippery slope' and that clients have already raised concerns" (L.A. TIMES, 7/25).