Ballmer Reportedly Declines Prime Ticket's Extension Jim Buss Remains Optimistic About Lakers Men In Blazers Planning To Hold Convention Leonsis Weighing Wizards Practice Facility Spots Hornets Announce New Broadcast Team ESPN's Mendoza To Replace Schilling Sunday Players' Tribune Launching Branded Video Series "Ballers" First Season Strong For HBO Media Notes NFL Reluctant On Long-Term "TNF" Deal
SBD/June 15, 2012/Media
Rome "Stunned" By Stern's Comments, Calls Draft Lottery Question A "Softball"
Published June 15, 2012
WAR OF WORDS: The GLOBE & MAIL’s Bruce Dowbiggin writes, "If you think media interviewing is a blood sport, then Rome definitely was gored in the exchange with Stern.” Making Rome a “sympathetic figure takes some doing.” If Rome “wanted to (respectfully) ask the question, he could have asked Stern about the optics of the Hornets being owned by the league with all that implies in the wake” of the NBA's gambling scandal involving former referee Tim Donaghy. But a “careless question drew a careless answer from a man who probably feels he’s above suffering fools at this stage in his career.” Dowbiggin: “Which doesn’t forgive Stern. Were he not a legend in the business, he might have committed a fireable offence." While Rome’s “act was par for the course, Stern did himself and his league no favours with his uncharacteristic sulk” (GLOBE & MAIL, 6/15).
CLASS DISMISSED? FORBES.com’s Patrick Rishe wrote Stern’s response “showed an air of classlessness and hypocrisy that is not befitting a man who has largely been a respected sports executive and administrator for years.” Rishe: “Classless in that he chose a much more aggressive tact than was necessary under the circumstances in my judgment. Hypocritical because the league’s office is quick to penalize its players and coaches who choose similarly aggressive tactics when talking about matters such as NBA officiating, or who have made comments or gestures that reflect violence” (FORBES.com, 6/14).
STERN WARNING: YAHOO SPORTS’ Adrian Wojnarowski wrote under the header, “David Stern’s Tantrum To Jim Rome Another Reason Why It’s Getting Time For Him To Leave.” Wojnarowski: "For all the young diva stars in the sport, no one has an entourage of yes men as deep as the NBA's commissioner. ... No one dares tell Stern the ultimate truth that his ego, his vindictiveness, is an embarrassment to the league." The controversial response "wasn’t about Stern’s honor, his reputation or defending his good name on Rome’s radio show." If Stern "can’t handle a line of questioning on the draft lottery without resorting to personal insults, he shouldn’t sit for the interviews.” For the “good of the legacy that Stern so cherishes and, more importantly, for the good of the NBA, there needs to be a succession of power soon.” Wojnarowski: "The longer Stern stays, the worse for his legacy. It’s sad to watch, and his accomplishments do deserve a graceful ending" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 6/14).