Rice Apologizes, Calls Suspension Out Of His Control Pauley Pavilion Will Be Ready For Basketball Season Texans' McNair Withholding Judgement On Raiders Sources: Irsay likely Suspended 3-4 Games Braves Name Developers For Mixed-Use Property NFL Implementing Player-Tracking Technology Raptors Looking Into New Practice Facility Facility Notes Redskins Hire PR Firm To Run Moniker Website NFL Franchise Notes
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/May 8, 2012/Facilities
Vikings Stadium Plan Clears House, But Team Calls Increased Share "Not Workable"
Published May 8, 2012
STILL WAITING: Dayton called the House vote a "huge step forward" and said there were "more positive votes than almost anyone expected." In St. Paul, Doug Belden notes the House bill "differs significantly from the one in the Senate, and the differences would need to be resolved in conference committee, after which there would be another round of votes in the House and Senate before the bill goes to the governor" (ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, 5/8). In Minneapolis, Chip Scoggins writes "whatever the outcome" for the bill in the Senate, "the hope here is for resolution." Scoggins: "Yes or no, we need to move on. Everyone involved." Both sides "have battled long and hard, more than 10 years, a campaign that began when Red McCombs owned the team." Scoggins asks, "Would anyone honestly have the appetite for another round of this?" The debate "must have a finish line at some point." Scoggins adds his advice to Vikings Owner Zygi Wilf and his family "is to put the team up for sale and move on if they suffer a defeat this week." Scoggins: "If a stadium doesn't gain approval now, when will it? They've never been this close, but stadium fatigue will only intensify" (Minneapolis STAR TRIBUNE, 5/8).