Levi's Stadium Flush With High-Tech Amenities MLB Enjoys Action-Packed Trade Deadline U.S. Sens. Implore NFL, Ravens To Revisit Rice Discipline Panini Snags NFLPA Trading Card Exclusivity Toronto Group's Status Uncertain In Bills Sweepstakes Rice Apologizes, Calls Suspension Out Of His Control Texans' McNair Withholding Judgement On Raiders Sources: Irsay likely Suspended 3-4 Games NFL Implementing Player-Tracking Technology Redskins Hire PR Firm To Run Moniker Website
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/February 6, 2012/Leagues and Governing Bodies
Goodell Touches On Concussions, HGH Testing In State Of The League Address
Published February 6, 2012
TESTING PLAN: Goodell addressed the issue of HGH testing, saying the league "would like to implement" a testing plan in the offseason. He added, "We have been working to try to address the issues that the union's raised. We believe the science is clear ... on the fact that this test is valid and that we have the basis to put in and implement an HGH test that is fair to the players. We expect to be able to do that." Goodell after the press conference said, "We're all going to have to compromise a little bit ... and it needs to get done." Referencing last summer's CBA talks and the current HGH negotiations, NFL Network's Rich Eisen asked, "Didn't we learn, get the lawyers out of the room. Wasn't that the lesson learned?" Goodell: "I believe this is going to come down to the same type of thing" (NFL Network, 2/3). ESPN.com's John Clayton wrote, "My read is that both sides will get a deal done before the start of the 2012 season. The league contends players have received plenty of information about how tests are conducted and the accuracy of those tests." NFLPA Exec Dir DeMaurice Smith said that the union "would accept a plan if it receives a population study that details how results are tabulated." Smith is "still getting his players to accept the idea of blood tests, a concept uncomfortable to players." Clayton: "I wouldn't be surprised if they get something done around the time of the April draft once more information is given to the players" (ESPN.com, 2/3).
ROOM TO GROW: Goodell said that the NFL "has not talked about expansion" and the issue "has not been on our agenda." He said he does not see expansion "in the foreseeable future." Several teams have been rumored to be moving to L.A. when a new NFL stadium is built there, but Goodell said, "We want to keep our teams where they are. We believe that that's healthier for the league in the long-term." Asked if the NFL feels any "urgency" to bring a team to L.A., he said, "We would like to be back in Los Angeles if we can do it correctly. There are a lot of issues that have to be balanced there." He noted the new CBA and media deals "should give us the foundation to make smart decisions and try to find a good solution" in L.A (NFL Network, 2/3). Goodell also explained his comments during an interview with NBC's Bob Costas Thursday "about the possibility of expansion that were widely misinterpreted." Goodell had said that if the league "were to expand, it would probably do so by two teams so as not to be left with an odd number of 33" (L.A. TIMES, 2/4). In California, Brian Charles noted Rose Bowl officials "took Goodell's lack of commitment with a dose of skepticism." Rose Bowl Operating Company Board President and Pasadena Council Member Victor Gordo: "Until the NFL is serious about talking with us and until an NFL owner is serious about moving to the area, it's a wait and see game" (PASADENA STAR NEWS, 2/4). In Detroit, Jerry Green wrote, "I'm not sure whether the NFL abandoned Los Angeles or Los Angeles abandoned the NFL. Some of each, I suppose." The NFL has "thrived without a team in" L.A. Both L.A. stadium groups, "despite the rhetoric and good ideas, at the moment lack a shovel." Neither "has started to dig." And as "Goodell says, he wishes for the 32 franchises to stay just where they are" (DETROIT NEWS, 2/4).
GOING OUTSIDE THE U.S.: Goodell said the Bills playing games in Toronto has helped to "regionalize that team" and not only "broaden its exposure, but also its fan following." The Toronto series, which expires after the '12 season, has been "very helpful to the Bills in building that fan base (and) we've seen the kind of response and what its done for the season ticket sales for them down in Buffalo." Goodell said he believes there is a "willingness and interest to try to extend the agreement" and play more games in Toronto (NFL Network, 2/3). In Toronto, Cathal Kelly wrote it is "now clear that Toronto was never more than a life-support system for the Buffalo Bills in Roger Goodell’s mind." In addressing a question specifically about Toronto, Goodell "barely mentioned the city." He went on to say that he "hopes the current five-year deal that sees Buffalo visit the Rogers Centre once a season is renewed for another go-round." What he "didn’t say was even more clear -- if you are one of those who believe the NFL sees value in extending their operation outside of the United States, you are right." If you "thought that meant they were coming to Canada, you are wrong" (TORONTO STAR, 2/4). Also in Toronto, Mike Rutsey wrote if there is a "global stage that the NFL wants to penetrate, Canada doesn't appear to be very high on the list" (TORONTO SUN, 2/4). In Toronto, Steve Simmons wrote, "This much is clear: The NFL views Toronto as a rich suburb of poor Buffalo." Goodell "doesn’t really have an interest in having a team in Toronto," but he "wants your money to keep his Bills alive" (TORONTO SUN, 2/4). Meanwhile, Goodell said the league "would like to get back to Mexico with another regular season game." He added playing games internationally is "all about a collective strategy to make our game more successful on a global basis." Goodell: "The efforts that we're putting in in London, as an example, are all designed to build a model that's going to grow our game in its popularity in the U.K. If that's successful, we'll expand throughout Europe" (NFL Network, 2/3).
HOME IMPROVEMENT: Goodell said one of the benefits of the 10-year CBA was "to have the 10 years of stability to be able to project down that path so we can make smart decisions and get stadiums built and the players, as partners, are contributing and helping us get these stadiums built." The G4 Fund "helps bridge that gap, find ways to help communities build that public/private partnership so we can get these stadiums built" (NFL Network, 2/3).