NFL Owners Approve Raiders Relocation Oakland Pol Wants Raiders Out Of Coliseum Jerry Jones Instrumental In Raiders Vote Golden Knights Owner Welcomes Raiders To Vegas Lakers' Jim Buss Resigns As Co-Trusteee Chargers Sell Out Of Season Tickets For Next Year Ravens Could Invest In E-Sports Within A Year Owners Set To Approve Raiders' Vegas Move? Mayor Makes Last-Ditch Effort To Keep Raiders Woody Johnson May Be Closer To U.K. Ambassador Role
SBD/January 30, 2012/Franchises
Bruins Owner Jacobs Supports Tim Thomas' Right To Opt Out Of White House Ceremony
Published January 30, 2012
REACTION CONTINUES: Thomas said Friday of the response to his decision, "It's all media driving right now, and has been from the start." He added, "Everything that I said and did was as an individual, not as a representative of the Boston Bruins." In Toronto, Dave Feschuk noted the "problem, just one of many in Thomas's line of illogic, is that this ongoing matter has everything to do with the Boston Bruins" (TORONTO STAR, 1/28). In Toronto, Steve Simmons noted Thomas "wasn’t personally invited to The White House. The Stanley Cup champion Bruins were." Simmons: "This is not, as some people have made it, comparable to the politics of Muhammad Ali. This was a stance of little relevance and Thomas’ statement to explain his position had no mention of his team or his teammates, brushing them aside" (TORONTO SUN, 1/29). In Detroit, Drew Sharp writes because White House team championship ceremonies "generally are apolitical, Thomas' actions disrespected the office, not the man" (DETROIT FREE PRESS, 1/30). In Denver, Adrian Dater wrote, "The more I've thought about it, the more I think 'who cares?' about Tim Thomas' one-man boycott of the White House last week." Dater: "At first, I thought it was a slap in the face of his teammates. As time went by, I thought his teammates couldn't care less about it" (DENVER POST, 1/29).