Predators' Freeman Sues Team, Fellow Owner NHL Prospects Coming From Warm-Weather Cities Foley Shifts Focus To Hockey Operations UFC Fighters Voicing Unhappiness Over Pay NHL Announces Las Vegas As Expansion Team NFL, NFLPA Partner With Cirque Du Soleil Four-Part Series Looks At NHL Concussions Can Las Vegas Sustain Long-Term Success? Foley Becomes Public Figure After Vegas Approval League Notes
SBD/December 6, 2011/Leagues and Governing Bodies
NHL BOG Approved Realigning Into Four Conferences Beginning Next Season
Published December 6, 2011
|CONFERENCE A||CONFERENCE B||CONFERENCE C||CONFERENCE D|
BETTMAN WANTS TO TALK TO UNION: In Toronto, Damien Cox notes Bettman wants to speak with NHLPA Exec Dir Donald Fehr "before making the new conferences and schedule official." It is "unclear whether the union has the right under the current CBA to actually approve the new alignment or not, and Bettman declined to answer that direct question." NHLPA Communications Dir Jonathon Weatherdon said, "Realignment requires an agreement between the league and the NHLPA" (TORONTO STAR, 12/6). In N.Y., Larry Brooks reported prior to the realignment vote that the NHLPA "has cited ramifications of a playoff qualification in expressing concern with, if not downright opposition to, a proposed shift from the current structure to a four-division setup." A source indicated that the union "does not favor a setup to two seven-team divisions and two eight-team divisions." The NHLPA "believes such a setup would be unfair to teams in the eight-team divisions" and also has "expressed concerns about changes in the schedule that would create increased travel" (N.Y. POST, 12/4).
EXECS LIKE THE DEAL: Capitals VP & GM George McPhee said, "It’s a great realignment in every regard. Everybody else in the league seems to be happy as well. The Western teams have an extra team in their conference and less travel as a result" (WASHINGTONPOST.com, 12/6). Kings President of Business Operations Luc Robitaille said, "We like the fact that every team on the East Coast will come to L.A. We think it's a great thing for our fans and a great thing for us" (L.A. TIMES, 12/6). Blue Jackets President Mike Priest said, "This is what's right for the league, but it's also something that will make a big, big difference for our franchise, both on the ice and off the ice. This is huge" (COLUMBUS DISPATCH, 12/6). Sharks GM Doug Wilson: "Sometimes the easiest thing is not always the right thing. Sometimes if everybody accepts a little bit of the burden, the right thing is done" (SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS, 12/6).
because the Thrashers moved to Winnipeg
KEEPING TEAMS HAPPY: The GLOBE & MAIL's David Shoalts notes execs from "both the Red Wings and Blue Jackets said they were happy with the new look." Blue Jackets GM Scott Howson said, "This was a compromise that satisfied everybody. It’s going to make our travel easier on the players" (GLOBE & MAIL, 12/6). In Edmonton, Terry Jones writes having the Red Wings and Blue Jackets in a division with six teams based in the Central Time Zone, "with the extra games against Eastern opponents, is a decent deal for Detroit and Columbus." Jones: "It dramatically reduces the late-night TV starts from Mountain and Pacific time zones. Their TV numbers just got better and TV and radio deals worth more money" (EDMONTON SUN, 12/6). In Toronto, Damien Cox noted a "few teams -- notably Detroit, Dallas, Colorado and Minnesota -- have really carried a heavy burden in terms of both travel and TV/time zone issues, and it would be fair to help those teams out" (THESTAR.com, 12/5). In Detroit, Kulfan & Krupa note for "more than two decades, the Red Wings' major opponents for the Stanley Cup were both other teams and the travel schedule they faced as a team in the Eastern Time zone playing out west" (DETROIT NEWS, 12/6). Stars GM Joe Nieuwendyk said the change "helps the fans with watching on television, and ... really changes the structure of our rivalries" (DALLAS MORNING NEWS, 12/6). Sabres D Robyn Regehr said, "Everyone wants a level playing field. Television, that's a big thing. Teams want to provide their fan with a game that's at a decent hour. Teams like Detroit, Columbus, Nashville, when they're going out to the West Coast to play, their games are on so late" (BUFFALO NEWS, 12/6).
FLORIDA TEAMS GETTING RAW DEAL? In Ft. Lauderdale, Craig Davis notes the shift "means the Florida Panthers will be spending more time in the air, and transplants and visitors from Canada will be able to see their teams more often in South Florida." For the Panthers, realignment "will greatly increase travel expenses and the number and duration of trips." GM Dale Tallon "has frequently complained about the Panthers' 'terrible' travel situation." The new format "would mean longer flights even to games within the division, with the exception of Tampa Bay" (South Florida SUN-SENTINEL, 12/6). CBSSPORTS.com's Brian Stubits writes this "really does seem like the best solution to please the most teams." The only teams "that really seemed to get jobbed by the arrangement are the two teams in Florida, the Panthers and Lightning." Excluding "each other, their closest division foes are in Buffalo and Boston" (CBSSPORTS.com, 12/6). In Toronto, Mike Zeisberger notes given the "number of Snowbirds who flock from Canada to Florida each and every winter, it will almost feel as if the Leafs have additional home games on the sked when you consider how many Toronto fans attend contests in Tampa and Sunrise whenever the blue-and-white are in town" (TORONTO SUN, 12/6).
NOT SO FAST: THE HOCKEY NEWS' Ken Campbell writes there will be "those who will be applauding the NHL over its radical realignment scheme," and the NHL "indeed deserves a pat on the back for all of those things." But Campbell asks, "How on earth can the league announce this major realignment and not come to some sort of closure on which teams will meet in the Stanley Cup final? Isn’t that kind of like building the Taj Mahal and delaying putting on the roof?" Campbell: "We still have no idea whether there’s a possibility of two teams from the east or two teams from the west meeting in the Stanley Cup final because, in true NHL fashion, the board deferred that crucial detail until later" (THEHOCKEYNEWS.com, 12/6).