ESPN Draws Lowest "MNF" Rating Of '14 Finebaum Hosting Call-In Show During Iron Bowl FS North's Ratings Decline For Twins Games Continues App Review: Cavaliers For iPhone Cowboys-Giants Rating Lower On NBC ESPN May Sell Video Subs For Cricket Tourney Media Notes MLB Fires Back Against MASN In Court Battle Bama Again Draws CBS' Top CFB Audience Rogers Defends NHL GamePlus Exclusivity
SBD/November 14, 2011/Media
UFC Debuts On Fox With 3.1 Rating; Telecast Draws In Young Male Demographic
Published November 14, 2011
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
TUNING IN: YAHOO SPORTS’ Dave Meltzer noted Fox' broadcast was the “largest audience ever to watch an MMA television show in the United States, breaking the record of 5.3 million set on Sept. 30, 2009, for an episode of ‘The Ultimate Fighter’ reality show on Spike TV featuring a taped match of Kimbo Slice vs. Roy Nelson.” Although Fox execs “would not predict a rating ahead of time, reports in the business press were that the network was selling ads based on predictions of 4.5 million viewers, so even with the short fight, they easily beat their goal.” The show was “an even bigger success in the target demographics, doing a 4.3 among males aged 18-34 and 4.0 in males 18-49." The “most impressive” figure was that the show “drew 1.7 million women over the age of 18” (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 11/13). In N.Y., Richard Sandomir wrote under the header, “Fox’s UFC Broadcast A Hit With Viewers.” The 4.3 rating in the male 18-34 demo is higher than "any college football telecast this season” outside of LSU-Alabama on Nov. 5 (N.Y. TIMES, 11/13). In St. Petersburg, Tom Jones writes the 5.7 million viewers is not a huge number "compared to major sports, but the fight did well among key male demographics and it wasn't bad considering the fight went up against college football, including a marquee matchup between Stanford and Oregon” (ST. PETERSBURG TIMES, 11/14).
SHORT BUT SWEET? The AP’s Greg Beacham noted Dos Santos beat Velasquez in just 64 seconds, bringing a “swift end" to UFC's primetime network debut. The national audience “got a taste of MMA’s violence but not much else in the unusually short fight.” White “chose the two fearsome fighters for his Fox debut because of the high potential for a stoppage victory.” But he was “clearly not thrilled with just how quickly that end arrived, criticizing Velasquez’s decision to stand and fight with Dos Santos, one of the best boxers in MMA.” Beacham noted “most of the broadcast was taken up by a primer on MMA and the two fighters -- along with more post-fight analysis than expected” (AP, 11/12). FOXSPORTS.com’s Billy Witz wrote UFC’s “long-awaited prime time moment was just that -- a moment.” Although White “raved about the production being a success, he conspicuously avoided any such flowery assessment of the fight.” Dos Santos-Velasquez “lacked the drama or controversy of Manny Pacquiao’s decision over Juan Manuel Marquez later Saturday night.” White: “What you guys have to understand is we were talking to people who have never seen UFC before. We were trying to educate people. Most of us live in this bubble of MMA. You have to ease these people into this. Tonight, we eased our way into national television” (FOXSPORTS.com, 11/13).
Fertitta (l), White and Frank Fertitta (r)
PRAISE FOR THE PRODUCTION: In S.F., Peter Hartlaub wrote most of the first Fox UFC broadcast "was well done,” and the broadcast team of Mike Goldberg and Joe Rogan “did a good job of keeping things simple for new fans” (SFGATE.com, 11/12). YAHOO SPORTS’ Maggie Hendricks wrote the hour-long broadcast was “well-paced and informative, but far from perfect.” There were “elements that the UFC and Fox should definitely do again, and a few they need to change.” Some of the changes could include reminding White “to take a breath.” Hendricks noted White, who served as an analyst, was “excited and nervous, but my Twitter timeline was filled with people who don't usually watch MMA saying that they didn't understand White.” In addition, Fox and UFC next time should “make room for another fight, or at least show a highlight reel of the undercard” (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 11/13). In Las Vegas, Case Keefer noted first UFC fight on network TV “featured nothing resembling momentum swings or heavy slugging exchanges that would have captivated casual sports fans.” Still, White described the co-production with the UFC and FOX on the evening as “seamless” (LAS VEGAS SUN, 11/13). SI.com’s Jeff Wagenheim wondered, “What kind of impression did the UFC make on those folks at home who were curious enough to tune in?” Viewers “might have had a better chance of ‘getting’ the UFC if they'd got to see the co-main event.” Still, that UFC’s time under the network TV spotlight “involved just 64 seconds of fighting did not bother” White. He said, "Tonight couldn't have gone better” (SI.com, 11/13).
CONVERTING THE CURIOUS INTO FANS: In N.Y., Barry Bearak noted UFC was seeking “to make its way into the mainstream,” but can Saturday night fights on Fox -- this one and four next year – “entice the curious into the octagon and win their loyalty?” TBA Worldwide Chief Strategy Officer Rich Luker, said, “UFC is definitely bigger now than boxing or wrestling, maybe even the two combined, though not yet as big as either during their peaks. It’s clearly the flavor of the month, but that was once true of poker and then the numbers fell like a rock.” Zuffa’s books are private, but Fertitta said, “I feel pretty comfortable saying we’re the most valuable sports franchise on the planet, more than Manchester United, more than the New York Yankees, more than the Dallas Cowboys.” Bearak noted that would put UFC “in the $2 billion range.” UFC has acquired World Extreme Cagefighting, Pride Fighting Championships and Strikeforce and it is “provoking complaints of monopolistic practices.” But Fertitta said, “We bought up guys who were going bankrupt. There’s no barrier to entry. If you want to start your own league, put together three letters, buy an octagon and sign some fighters.” Complaints about “antitrust violations have been made to the Federal Trade Commission, which has not disclosed whether an official investigation is under way.” Fertitta: “I don’t want to talk about the FTC. It’s inappropriate given that they are asking us questions, and I really can’t get into any details” (N.Y. TIMES, 11/12).