Padres Honor Selig With Ceremony, New Plaza ESPN Sorry For Report On Sam's Showering Habits MLB Franchise Notes Franchise Notes Mayor Seeks FCC Review Of SportsNet LA Impasse Marino Hiring Viewed As A Sound Business Move Gay Pride Nights Popular Among MLB Teams Players Poll: Raiders Are Least Desirable Team Big Payroll Doesn't Equal Success In MLB CFL Team To Give Out Free Tickets After Loss
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/November 2, 2011/Franchises
McCourt, MLB Reach Agreement To Put Dodgers Up For Auction
Published November 2, 2011
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? ESPN L.A.'s Tony Jackson reports there is "no immediate timetable for the sale of the team, but such things typically take several months to complete." It is "unclear how this will affect the Dodgers' offseason player moves" (ESPNLA.com, 11/2). ESPN's Buster Olney tweeted, "It's hard to imagine that the Dodgers' situation would be settled soon enough for them to pursue likes of [Albert] Pujols, [Prince] Fielder" (TWITTER.com, 11/2). YAHOO SPORTS' Tim Brown notes there is "no minimum sale price demanded by McCourt or, apparently, guaranteed by MLB." There also "would seem to be no lack of potential bidders" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 11/2). CNBC’s Darren Rovell tweeted, “Despite the damage McCourt did, I'm setting the early over/under on Dodgers sale at $875 million” (TWITTER.com, 11/2).
END OF AN ERA: In N.Y., Richard Sandomir notes the settlement "appears to satisfy both sides." Selig "gets McCourt out of baseball and can possibly steer the sale to a preferred buyer." For McCourt, the settlement "gives him a way out of his financial hole," and he "might even emerge with some profits" (N.Y. TIMES, 11/2).YAHOO SPORTS' Brown writes, "The end is shocking in its swiftness and equanimity." One source said that McCourt "had had enough." He decided that selling the club was in the "best interests of the franchise, the city, everyone involved." Brown writes, "There was no way back, not without killing more of it. Couldn’t he have done this two years ago, when everybody was telling him it was his only way out?" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 11/2). CBSSPORTS.com's Scott Miller writes McCourt's decision "amounts to a final surrender." It has "been clear to everyone but him for more than a year that he was fighting a losing battle" (CBSSPORTS.com, 11/2). ESPN's Jerry Crasnick said as “combative as Frank McCourt was, even he had to read the writing on the wall.” Crasnick noted McCourt is broke and said, “People in L.A. hate him at this point. He has no credibility there, they don’t want him there. I think he had to realize, ‘Look, let’s cut my losses.’” ESPN L.A.'s Jackson said, "Ultimately, Frank realized he had no place to go. He’s got so many debts and obligations that if he wanted to get enough money out of the sale to have anything leftover once he paid all those debts and obligations, he finally just realized now was the time” (“SportsCenter,” ESPN, 11/2).
NOT A MOMENT TOO SOON: In L.A., Bill Plaschke writes the settlement agreement marks the ending of "the saddest chapter in Dodger history." McCourt will "sell the team that his financial mismanagement allowed to become the saddest of baseball jokes." He will "sell a stadium that his unpopularity turned into a ghost town." McCourt is "realizing he's out of money and out of options," and he is "giving it up so quickly that the league hopes the Dodgers will have a new owner by opening day." Plaschke writes, "Bud Selig owes us. The baseball commissioner who allowed a seriously underfunded McCourt to take the team from desperate Fox in 2004 owes us a strong and viable owner this time" (L.A. TIMES, 11/2). ESPN L.A.'s Ramona Shelburne writes the franchise "wasn't diminished by Frank McCourt's ownership, it was renewed." The Dodgers "meant more to Los Angeles once McCourt cast them into purgatory." Shelburne: "Every new indignity he inflicted on the team, every sacred law he broke, made these proud fans realize all that they had lost" (ESPNLA.com, 11/2). Syndicated radio host Jim Rome wrote on Twitter, “Frank McCourt finally decides to sell the Dodgers. About two years too late. Should have tapped out long ago. Don't let the door hit you." NBC News' Chuck Todd wrote, “Attn: MLB: Like Frank McCourt, I, too, can put very little money down, can I buy the Dodgers now?” (TWITTER.com, 11/1).
INTERESTED PARTIES: Mavericks Owner Mark Cuban said that he "offered to buy the Dodgers several months ago but declined to enter negotiations" after McCourt indicated that the "price would be in the range of $1 billion to $1.2 billion." Cuban said that he "remains interested" in purchasing the team. McCourt spokesperson Steve Sugerman said that the Dodgers owner "denied ever discussing a possible sale with Cuban." Cuban later said that he "had not spoken directly with McCourt but said he had discussions with an employee that worked with the McCourts" (L.A. TIMES, 11/2). ESPN's Crasnick said, “I’ve always thought baseball was a little bit wary of Mark Cuban. He’s not sort of the old-boy network type. And after the mess of the McCourt situation, they want to do this thing right so they’re going to look at every possibility” (“SportsCenter,” ESPN, 11/2). Syndicated radio host Dan Patrick said, "Mark’s on record as saying the Dodgers aren’t worth a billion dollars. The Dodgers will be worth close to that to somebody who wants to say, ‘I’m the owner of the Dodgers.’” Patrick: "The Dodgers are a brand. How much is that brand worth? Who’s willing to pony up?" The L.A. Times' Shaikin said, "A lot of the people who are seriously interested don’t say anything until it’s actually time to bid. So I would venture that some of the strongest candidates are people that we have not heard about. ... There’ll be no shortage of interest from private business people” ("The Dan Patrick Show," 11/2). ESPN The Magazine's Molly Knight wrote on her Twitter account, "Potential Dodgers' bidders include: Dennis Gilbert, Burt Sugarman, Garvey/Hershiser, Mark Cuban, and more. People will come out of woodwork" (TWITTER.com, 11/2).
TV TALK: DAILY VARIETY's Jon Weisman noted new ownership "could bring happy tidings to Fox Sports, which according to its contract with the Dodgers has an exclusive negotiating window through November 2012 for the post-2013 local TV rights." Given that Fox earlier this year lost the Lakers to Time Warner Cable, the Dodgers are the "centerpiece to Fox Sports' Southern California sports endeavors, even more so in probability with McCourt no longer complicating their future" (VARIETY.com, 11/1).