Brain Bank Finds CTE Increase In Former NFLers NFL Pushes Ahead On Breast Cancer Initiatives Arizona Fall League To Test Pace-Of-Play Ideas Arbitrator To Rule In Ray Rice Appeal Judge Orders Discovery In Hamburg-ATP Case Next For NFL In London: Back-To-Back Games NFL Again Refutes Report On Knowldge Of Rice Tape Jeter's Retirement Leaves Void As Face Of MLB Official Says He Sent Tape To NFL Security Chief HGH Testing For NFLers Could Begin Next Week
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/October 18, 2011/Leagues and Governing Bodies
Wheldon's Death Puts Spotlight On IndyCar For Wrong Reasons
Published October 18, 2011
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
LOOKING AT ALL OPTIONS: In Indianapolis, Anthony Schoettle noted IndyCar officials are “likely to evaluate the design of the series' cars and the tracks it races on.” Frost Motorsports President Tim Frost said, “The safety record of (the IndyCar Series) has been good, but after this, they’ll be taking a long look at everything.” Former IndyCar and F1 driver Derek Daly said, “As tragic as this accident is, IndyCar has to stick to its business plan, learn what they can from this accident, and push forward. If this accident can improve the safety and improve this sport, I think Dan Wheldon would be proud to have that be part of his legacy” (IBJ.com, 10/17). ESPN's Terry Blount said the speed cars had reached during practice and qualification at Las Vegas “was just too fast,” and while he noted IndyCar has raced at other tracks similar to LVMS, the “difference was they had so many cars in the field which they usually don’t have.” Blount said the “dilemma” for IndyCar is “they need to race at these big oval tracks to draw more attention from more fans and get more people to come." Blount: “They still need to race at these tracks, but they have got to make changes. Slow the cars down" ("SportsCenter,” ESPN, 10/17). Dallas Morning News columnist Tim Cowlishaw said IndyCar “runs the problem of having a lack of appeal, and so it goes to where the big tracks are and where it can draw fans. But should they be running on those tracks? They have to look at it. ... I don’t know if they can do much more than to look at some of these tracks they run on and see if they’re really safe enough” (“Around The Horn,” ESPN, 10/17). NASCAR driver and former IndyCar driver Max Papis wrote on his Twitter feed, “I agree with u @JimmieJohnson if indycar can't find another a way on 1.5 ovals they should not race even if we raced safely in CART days” (TWITTER.com, 10/17). SPEEDTV.com's Robin Miller reports IndyCar CEO Randy Bernard "immediately began questioning himself on whether there were too many cars or the series should have avoided places like Las Vegas Motor Speedway." CART "figured out a way to run superspeedways with big fields in the late 1990s with an aero helper known as the Handford Device." Miller: "No more running wide open: ANYWHERE. And that's still a possibility with the new cars and engines for 2012" (SPEEDTV.com, 10/18).
TOO MUCH NEED FOR SPEED? CNBC's Brian Sullivan said some people "are saying you've just got to slow them down." Sullivan: "The fans want speed, but there's only so fast you can go in a car" ("Street Signs," CNBC, 10/17). Former F1 driver Jackie Stewart: “It may be that we have to have smaller engines with smaller horsepower and slower speeds in IndyCar racing. Do we have to do 230, 240mph? If all the cars were travelling at the same speeds, if you could knock off 30 or 40mph from that speed, frankly no one would notice” (London DAILY MAIL, 10/18). NBC’s Matt Lauer said, "We love speed, we love risk. But when technology allows guys to go around a track at 225-milers-per-hour on a crowded track, is it too much?” Former driver Mario Andretti said speeds have "absolutely not” gotten too fast. Andretti: "In fact, the speeds were higher back in the ‘90s when I was still racing. Some of the problem is that the cars are actually underpowered and they’re all the same. … They can’t get away from each other” (“Today,” NBC, 10/18).
WAKE UP CALL: In Charlotte, Scott Fowler writes Wheldon’s death “needs to serve as a wakeup call to that racing series -- its own sad version of an ‘Earnhardt moment.’" NASCAR driver Dale Earnhardt's death in '01 “inspired numerous and effective safety upgrades in stock-car racing, and Wheldon's must do the same in the struggling sport of open-wheel racing.” Former SMI President & CEO Humpy Wheeler said, "IndyCars absolutely must become bigger, slower and safer" (CHARLOTTE OBSERVER, 10/18). The Dallas Morning News' Cowlishaw said when Earnhardt died in ’01, it "took something like that to really move that sport forward in terms of safety” ("Around The Horn," ESPN, 10/17). In London, Kevin Eason writes the IndyCar series “now faces its ‘Senna moment’ and the biggest inquest in its long and illustrious history” (LONDON TIMES, 10/18). In London, Rick Broadbent writes Bernard's “problem remains trying to sell the danger without risking safety or glamorising crashes.” The “best hope now may be that a tragedy leads to wide-reaching change, just as it did in Formula One and NASCAR after the fatal crashes” of Senna and Earnhardt (LONDON TIMES, 10/18). CBS News' Bill Whitaker noted IndyCar "had made some impressive safety improvements over the years that have reduced deaths and serious accidents” ("Evening News," CBS, 10/17). In N.Y., Jerry Garrett writes “questions remain as to what can be done to improve the margin of safety.” For now, however, officials in charge of the sport “are loath to talk about what shape those changes might take.” Bernard on Sunday after announcing Wheldon’s death said, “That is a topic for another time.” IndyCar VP/Communications & PR Amy Konrath yesterday said, “We will be in touch when we are ready to comment.” SMI and Las Vegas Motor Speedway declined to comment (N.Y. TIMES, 10/18). After Wheldon’s death was announced, driver Dario Franchitti was asked about safety concerns. Franchitti: “We’ll discuss it and we’ll sort it out, but now’s not the time” (L.A. TIMES, 10/18).
IS BIGGEST BETTER? The WALL STREET JOURNAL’s Berzon & Bachman report Bernard “tried to make Indy racing more exciting, like its more popular cousin, NASCAR.” Bernard in June said the change to restarts would mean more "carnage and wrecks," adding the "danger will be an important element of the sport." But yesterday in an e-mail he said, "I'm sorry if my comments are interpreted this way. Danger has been an inherent part of the sport since 1909. I don't know if what I said was taken out of context or I misspoke, but if you know me, you know where my loyalties lie, and I'm very respectful to the drivers and the sport." Berzon & Bachman noted prior to his role with IndyCar, Bernard “had developed a reputation as a marketing whiz who turned the once-obscure sport of bull-riding into a nationally televised phenomenon,” and he “was recruited with a similar mandate to the Indy circuit.” Some of Bernard's efforts “appeared to be paying off,” as IndyCar races on Versus this year “drew the most viewers since the cable channel started airing races in 2009.” For many longtime drivers as sponsors, the Las Vegas race "was to be the culmination of many of those efforts.” Trade investment promotion agency Apex-Brasil USA Operations Manager & COO Silvia Pierson, whose company sponsors IndyCar, said, "The buzz in Vegas was amazing before the race" (WALL STREET JOURNAL, 10/18). ESPN IndyCar analyst Eddie Cheever said IndyCar is “in the process of reinventing itself” with Bernard, and that has included a "lot to bring more attention to Indy cars." Cheever: "But I’m afraid that the balance has moved a little bit too far to the entertainment side, and in doing that they have overlooked some very basic issues that they have” ("Outside The Lines," ESPN, 10/17).
IndyCar following Wheldon's death