CBS Praised For Its Handling Of Pregame Show Panthers Let Legal Process Play Out On Hardy Owners Throw Support Behind Goodell Major Sponsors Sticking By NFL Steelers-Ravens Draws Combined 13.7 Overnight Bills' Home Opener Sells Out Mueller's Ties To Law Firm Brings Questions NFL Week 1 Sees Mixed Results With Ratings Sources: Rice Told Goodell He Hit Palmer Leagues' Domestic Violence Policies Under Scrutiny
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/August 19, 2011/Leagues and Governing Bodies
Goodell's Reputation May Suffer In Aftermath Of Pryor Decision
Published August 19, 2011
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
THE FUTURE IS A MYSTERY: In N.Y., Bart Hubbuch writes Goodell "opened up quite the Pandora's box yesterday." His "bizarre decision" was accepted by Pryor and the NFLPA "only because the league was threatening to exclude him from this year's supplemental draft entirely." An NFL source said that the union was "prepared to fight the move on the grounds NCAA violations have never had any official bearing on a player's status, but Pryor's agent, Drew Rosenhaus, convinced the NFLPA to back down" (N.Y. POST, 8/19). FOXSPORTS.com's Alex Marvez noted the five-game suspension "was a condition given Pryor" for entry into the supplemental draft, and NFLPA Assistant Exec Dir for External Affairs George Atallah said that the union "consented to allow Pryor into the draft with restrictions." But Atallah added the decision "does not set any sort of precedent for future situations." He said, "There is no formalized plan or agreement between us and the league to do this in the future." NFL Senior VP/PR Greg Aiello said the league is "enforcing our own rules" rather than carrying over the NCAA's original five-game suspension. Aiello: "Pryor made decisions that undermined the integrity of our draft eligibility rules" (FOXSPORTS.com, 8/18). In Cleveland, Doug Lesmerises writes Goodell "didn't suspend Pryor for his NCAA violations," rather he suspended Pryor "for messing with the NFL system." The supplemental draft "is for players who lose their college eligibility after the January deadline to declare for the regular draft." The league "clearly didn't like the way Pryor tried to twist his case, and emphasize his NCAA rule-breaking, to fit the supplemental draft rules" (Cleveland PLAIN DEALER, 8/19).
RULING CALLED "HYPOCRITICAL": ESPN’s Mark Schlereth said the NFL was "hypocritical” with the ruling. He said, "They talk about him violating the eligibility of the draft rules. Then guess what: Don’t make him eligible for the draft” ("NFL Live," ESPN, 8/18). ESPN's Jackie MacMullan noted the NFL has "underminded the integrity" of the supplemental draft. MacMullan: "To me, there’s a little bit of hypocrisy there. ... To say that this has nothing to with the NCAA is crazy. They’re absolutely in bed together on this ruling” (“Around The Horn,” ESPN, 8/18). ESPN's Mike Golic said, "He shouldn't be eligible for the supplemental draft." Golic added, "This is a horrible move. ...They dropped the ball on this one. To say the line, 'You made decisions that undermine the integrity of the supplemental draft,' and then let him in the draft is wrong" ("Mike & Mike in the Morning, ESPN Radio, 8/18).
A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT: An NFL source said that the Pryor decision sets a "dangerous precedent" and puts Goodell in a position "to punish future college players." The source added, "What if Goodell decides certain guys in the regular draft can be subject to conditions prior to entering the NFL? It breaches a wall where you're going to be punished at the next level for things done in college" (Cleveland PLAIN DEALER, 8/19). In Chicago, David Haugh writes under the header, "NFL Has No Business Disciplining Pryor." Haugh: "Explain how the NFL can justify enforcing the NCAA's five-game suspension of Pryor one year after welcoming Seahawks coach Pete Carroll into the league with a shrug." Goodell "means well by policing college renegades." But it is "hard to see how the NFL improves its product -- every commissioner's top priority -- by penalizing players retroactively for breaking another body's rules" (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 8/19). In Jacksonville, Jeff Elliott writes, "Think of some of the ramifications that could come from this. ... What will be interesting is to see how the NFL picks and chooses which penalties to impose on which players" (FLORIDA TIMES UNION, 8/19).
HELPING THE NCAA OUT? SI.com's Chris Burke wrote under the header, "NFL's Terrelle Pryor Decision A Head-Scratcher." Burke: "The problem with Thursday's ruling is that it created a gray area. If, instead of waiting until June to leave OSU and start thinking about the NFL, Terrelle Pryor had just, say, skipped class from January to April, he'd apparently be just fine in the eyes of the NFL. It seems like the league wanted to put its foot down here, either for its own dignity or to throw a bone to the NCAA, which is getting hammered with high-profile issues right now" (SI.com, 8/18). ESPN's Mike Greenberg, on the Pryor suspension: "This is Roger Goodell and the NFL saying, 'Hey NCAA, we got your back. This guy was going to be suspended five games for you, we're suspending him five games for us'" ("Mike & Mike in the Morning," ESPN Radio, 8/18). CBSSPORTS.com's Mike Freeman wrote what Goodell did "in suspending Pryor is get the NCAA's back." Freeman: "But this opens up an incredible Pandora's box. What Goodell did in suspending Pryor, I believe, is unprecedented in American sports. ... It opens up so many ethical and legal questions my head is spinning" (CBSSPORTS.com, 8/18).
But NFL Network’s Rich Eisen said if the NFL “did this to try and clean up the NCAA’s mess for them .. I say, bravo. Somebody’s got to do it” ("The Dan Patrick Show," 8/19).
MORE REACTIONS: ESPN's Michael Smith said, "I'm appalled at this. This is worse than not allowing him to (the) draft. We always knew the NCAA was a free minor league system for the NFL. Now, it's out in the open. ... This is ridiculous. Do not do the NCAA's dirty work for them." ESPN's Jemelle Hill: "Since when did the NFL become the NCAA's henchmen? ... This is an awful precedent. Since when do you care about NCAA violations?" ("First Take," ESPN2, 8/18). In Chicago, Jeff Hughes wrote, "Joke. No other word for it. Absolute joke" (CHICAGOTRIBUNE.com, 8/18). ESPN's Bomani Jones said, "This is the NCAA and the NFL running a tag team on Terrelle Pryor. ... I can’t believe that anybody can say that this is possibly okay. This is ridiculous.” But L.A. Times columnist Bill Plaschke said the NFL's decision was "brilliant." Plaschke: "It’s fair. It’s saying, ‘You know what? You want to come into our league, you come into our league our way'" ("Around The Horn," ESPN, 8/18).
WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE....: YAHOO SPORTS' Michael Silver wrote he hopes Goodell "is prepared to whip out his cattle prod and mete on an even harsher punishment to the next non-athlete who flees the league amid the backdrop of NCAA punishment." The "same Draconian logic should apply" should former OSU coach Jim Tressel land a coaching job in the NFL, and in those "of so many other collegiate coaches." Silver: "I fully expect Goodell to make the connection and to avoid being called a hypocrite by punishing them for their transgressions upon their acceptance of NFL employment contracts. Yeah, right. ... Goodell seems to apply wildly different standards when it comes to disciplining players as he does punishing coaches and other team employees" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 8/18). In S.F., Gwen Knapp writes Pete Carroll "left a burning house at USC for a $6.5 million salary in Seattle, and the NFL said nothing." Browns LB Scott Fujita wrote on Twitter, "That's EXACTLY what guys are asking in our locker right now, 'Well what about Pete Carroll?'" (S.F. CHRONICLE, 8/19).