Could Rousey's UFC Dominance Hurt Brand? AEG Reports Warn Against Inglewood Stadium Saints Succession Plan Change Followed Altercation MLS Players Tout United Front In CBA Talks Manfred: No Suspensions For Pace Violations Golf Searching For Next Superstar NFL Appeals Judge's Peterson Decision NRG Stadium Needs Upgrades For '17 Super Bowl NBPA's Roberts Questions Media Availability Dolphins To Sell Standing-Room Only Tickets
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/July 13, 2011/Leagues and Governing Bodies
NFL Lockout Watch, Day 124: Steelers' Harrison Blasts Goodell As A "Crook," "Devil"
Published July 13, 2011
REPAIR WORK NEEDED: CBSSPORTS.com's Mike Freeman wrote Goodell "will have to repair his image with a significant portion of his player base." Freeman: "It will be Goodell's most important post-lockout mission. He wasn't liked before the lockout by a number of players, who thought his disciplinary actions were far too draconian and his stances inflexible. Such opinions have only hardened." However, there are "1,900 players and a few expressing anger at Goodell doesn't mean that all are infuriated with the commissioner." Freeman: "It also has to be noted that in many ways Goodell has been extremely player-friendly during his tenure" (CBSSPORTS.com, 7/12). ESPN’s Cris Carter said of Harrison's comments, "If you really slow him down and listen to it, he does say some things that are very, very important. I mean there is a double standard in the National Football League if you look at the owners and the commissioner trying to increase the length of the season to 18 games. Now that is not in the best interest of the National Football League or the health of the players. As far as his other comments, be very, very careful. You play in the National Football League right now, you are at the height of your career and you’re at the height of your earning potential" (“SportsCenter,” ESPN, 7/13).
BACK TO THE GRIND: In N.Y., Bart Hubbuch reports the “key players in the NFL labor dispute resume negotiations today with the parameters of a deal in place but still no headway on the primary lingering issue -- rookie salaries.” The NFL season “appears to hinge now on the sides coming to an agreement on how to structure a much-needed overhaul of the rookie pay scale.” The owners “want the top pick to get a maximum of $25 million over a five-year deal, while also stipulating that first-round picks can be signed for that long.” But sources said that the players “want all rookie contracts to be as little as three years with the possibility of a team option for a fourth season for high picks” (N.Y. POST, 7/13). ESPN's Schefter reported players are looking "beyond just the rookie wage scale as part of the total revenue package." Schefter: "Even though the two sides are in agreement on that right now, if the owners come back to the players with a different number on the rookie wage scale, that would affect the overall revenue and that’s why there is a dispute.” He added, "Both sides believe they’ve given in to the other side on all other major points and both sides feel like they don’t want to go any further, thus the standoff we have right now” (“NFL Live,” ESPN, 7/12). Meanwhile, NFL.com's Albert Breer reported legal teams and officials for NFL owners and players yesterday "met for a second consecutive day at a Manhattan law firm, setting the stage for the Wednesday arrival of the principals in the league's labor dispute." Sessions yesterday and Monday "were productive, as the parties worked to close out language for necessary elements of a potential deal to end the lockout." There were 12 participants, "including NFL outside counsel Bob Batterman and NFL Players Association outside counsel Jeffrey Kessler, in Tuesday's nine-hour-plus session" (NFL.com, 7/12).
SETTING THE STAGE: NFL.com's Steve Wyche cited officials from several teams as saying that they are "anticipating the near-immediate arrival of players at team facilities within hours of a new collective bargaining agreement being reached." It is "unknown if teams will be able to stage any type of minicamps or formal on-field workouts before training camps start," but teams are "prepared for players' arrivals." They want to "administer physicals as soon as possible, especially to players that have had offseason procedures performed by surgeons other than team physicians" (NFL.com, 7/12). However, YAHOO SPORTS' Jason Cole reported the cancellation of the Aug. 7 Bears-Rams Pro Football HOF Game is "looking more and more likely." A coach from one of the two teams said, "You get past a certain point and you can't play that game ... the way things are going right now, I don't think we're going to have the time to travel for an extra game." HOF VP/Communications & Exhibits Joe Horrigan said that there is "no way to change the date of the enshrinement festivities," which are scheduled to begin Aug. 6. He added, "The game, although no one has suggested it, could at least in theory be rescheduled, it just wouldn't be a part of the Enshrinement Festival per se. Again, there would be the issue of ticket sales -- refunding or offering the same tickets at a different date, etc. -- but at least in theory, I guess in the strictest sense [it] could be possible" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 7/12).