Blatter Wins Fifth Term As FIFA President Sepp Blatter Holding His Ground Montreal Wants To Host MLB Regular-Season Games New "Hard Knocks" To Feature Texans FIFA Facing Untold Consequences After Indictments Bears' McCaskey Second-Guessing Signing McDonald Missouri Pols Sue Nixon Over NFL Stadium Plan CONCACAF Targeted In FIFA Investigation Blatter's Future Murky Amid FIFA Arrests Vegas NHL Group Well Past Ticket Deposit Goal
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/February 25, 2011/Leagues and Governing Bodies
Special Master's Redacted Report On NFL Broadcast Contracts Made Public
Published February 25, 2011
WORK STOPPAGE AGREEMENTS IMPORTANT FACTOR: Burbank did find that restructuring the work stoppage agreements (only DirecTV’s deal did not have the language) was an important factor in the new deals. Burbank wrote the NFL’s objectives in the negotiations included “securing work stoppage provisions that would … provide funding for debt service and operating expenses, thereby shifting leverage away from the players during a potential lockout.” Burbank also found that the NFL had committed a violation in the restructured ESPN contract related to the new work stoppage language, but found no damages. He found damages in the allocation of money for the NBC Sunday night game that ran against the World Series, for which he fined the league $6.9M. The NFLPA contends that Burbank is misinterpreting what is sound business judgment and that the NFL should have insisted on more money from the networks. The NFL in its brief pointed out that Burbank had agreed with its position that the union’s narrower view of the TV deals would hurt future revenue growth.
DEALS CARRY FUTURE ASSETS: The league argues the TV deals bartered a great deal of current and future assets: securing TV fees in uncertain times; getting league digital rights that could then be sold to Verizon; and the Red Zone rights. But the union’s position, the league said, is that each category should have been sold for cash. The union in its brief wrote the federal court should ignore the Red Zone argument because it was a completely unrelated business transaction, no different than a decision by the Vikings to raise ticket prices. However, part of the deals with CBS, Fox and ESPN were to allow Red Zone access to their games when teams were close to scoring. Red Zone could not have existed without those rights, and the league packaged Red Zone with NFL Network in selling to cable carriers. There is no mention in the briefs or in Burbank’s report of the restructured TV contracts having any ties to teams’ ticket prices.