Columnists React To Chargers Relocation News Goldman Committed To Financing Raiders' Vegas Venue Dean Spanos "Stung" By Criticism Relocations Affecting NFL Broadcasts For L.A. MLS To San Diego Now That Chargers Are Gone? San Diego Mayor, Fans In Upheaval Over Chargers NBA Looking To Have More Games Overseas Reactions To Chargers' Move Lean Negative Pegulas Address Reports Of Dysfunction On Location Offers Unique Deal For Big Game
SBD/February 2, 2011/Leagues and Governing Bodies
Special Master Rejects NFLPA's Complaint About NFL TV Payments
Published February 2, 2011
WANT MORE GREAT STORIES LIKE THIS?
CLICK ON ONE OF THESE BUTTONS
THE RULING ON THE FIELD: YAHOO SPORTS' Doug Farrar wrote "that the owners now have the money needed to dig in and wait the players out not only gives one side unfair advantage, it also sets up several needless complications -- a good sign that what we have here is a bad ruling." The NFL's TV partners are "now looking at paying millions of dollars for something that they cannot televise." The owners are "going to hoard money in payment for services that cannot be rendered and a product that doesn't exist ... unless the plan from here on out is to use replacement players again." Farrar noted the players now can "go full bore with the statement they've been making all along -- that in a time of unprecedented financial well-being for the league, all they've wanted to do was to keep the game going under the same parameters that have existed" since '06. That is "not what the owners want, but as the owners are basically in the position of taking free money ... the hearts and minds of the public will most likely swing to the players" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 2/1).