Peterson Opens Up Following NFL Suspension Roberts Says Taylor Suspension Was Excessive Minneapolis Area Official Chooses Side In MLS Bid MLB Approves Five-Year Manfred Deal NHL Calls For Dismissal Of Concussion Suit Cuomo: "Impractical" To Play Game In Buffalo Hornets' Taylor Suspended 24 Games Browns Ink TV Deal With Local ABC Affiliate NFL's Jeff Pash Addresses Peterson Suspension Vikings Ready To Move On Without Peterson
SBD/February 16, 2011/Leagues and Governing Bodies
NFL, Owners Reaffirm Commitment To Jerry Richardson Leading Talks
Published February 16, 2011
DID HE OR DIDN'T HE? NFLPA President Kevin Mawae said he was not in the Feb. 5 meeting at which Richardson reportedly was condescending toward players, but Mawae noted comments from Cardinals K and player rep Jay Feely about Richardson's behavior were "consistent with every report" he got from the meeting. Mawae: "They basically talked to them like they don't understand business reports and business papers. ... For us to go into a bargaining session and get talked down to by an owner is discouraging and it's just not right." He added, "At the end of the day, there're 32 owners, and the owners that want to get a deal done need to step up to the plate and let their voices be heard. If they're going to leave it up to Jerry Richardson, we'll keep spinning our wheels" ("The Jim Rome Show," 2/15). But NFL Exec VP & General Counsel Jeff Pash said, "I read the comments that were attributed to Mr. Richardson and that just categorically didn't happen. He never said anything like, 'Do I need to help you read a revenue chart, son?' I don't know where that came from." In N.Y., Judy Battista notes Richardson "has emerged as a lightning rod in the negotiations." In the past he "has acted as a bridge between owners and players," but now he is "viewed as one of the hawks, taking a hard line against players." But with just over two weeks until the March 4 deadline for a new CBA, the Richardson "flap will most likely be little more than a sideshow to the more critical development: there have been no conversations between representatives of the owners and the union since talks broke off after a negotiating session last Wednesday and no talks are scheduled" (N.Y. TIMES, 2/16).
LEADER OF MEN: CBSSPORTS.com's Mike Freeman wrote if NFLPA Exec Dir DeMaurice Smith is the "intellectual engine for the players' union in their battle against owners, one of the union's main emotional power sources" has been NFLPA Exec Committee member and Saints QB Drew Brees. A source said of Brees, "He's one of the most important people in this fight. He's among the toughest and the most liked. That's a great combination." Freeman noted Brees' reputation "as one of the most level-headed and decent people in football also has helped him earn the respect of many league officials and owners during the negotiations (well, every owner not named Jerry Richardson)." When many players around the league "have questions about the progress of the negotiations, they call Brees." Sources said that when players "want to vent, they call Brees ... because they knew he'll talk them off the ledge." One source said that when Richardson was "highly condescending to Manning in one moment during the negotiating session it was Brees who helped restore calm ... to what was a rapidly deteriorating situation" (CBSSPORTS.com, 2/15).
SIMMER DOWN: SI.com's Peter King wrote, "You shouldn't get too excited about anything in the negotiations between players and owners. History says players have gotten ticked off at pompous or overbearing owners during job actions in 1982 and 1987, the way some players are angry at ... Richardson for whatever he said in a meeting 10 days ago. None of this stuff really matters in deal-making" (SI.com, 2/15). Patriots OT and player rep Matt Light: "At this point, believe nothing that you hear and none of which you see. I just think it's a bad state right now. It's a bunch of people who are arguing over points that have nothing to do with what's at the heart of the matter" (BOSTON HERALD, 2/16).
NO TIMETABLE ON UNFAIR PRACTICE CLAIM: NFL.com's Jason La Canfora reported the National Labor Relations Board yesterday indicated that it "doesn't have a firm timetable for determining if the NFL's claim against the NFL Players Association has merit." The NFL "filed the claim Monday, stating the NFLPA hasn't collectively bargained in good faith and seeking a preemptive ruling to eliminate the union's ability to decertify following the March 3 expiration of the collective bargaining agreement." NLRB Dir of Public Affairs Nancy Cleeland "explained the process for investigating a claim like the NFL's and said there is no firm timetable on how long it could take." She added that "at this point it is undermined if, by merely filing the claim, the NFL would in effect preclude the union from decertifying until a ruling is made by the NLRB." La Canfora reported the NLRB "will thoroughly investigate the matter ... beginning with regional field staff and/or staff attorneys interviewing members of both negotiating parties, pouring over records of each session, what was proposed and whether or not parties showed up on time." They will try to determine if the NFLPA has been "surface bargaining" (NFL.com, 2/15). Mawae said the NFL's charge of unfair bargaining is "laughable." Mawae: "It's a joke considering the fact that the last proposal that was made was ours, and it took them two months to respond and they only responded with a one-page paper. ... Let's not forget that they're the ones that opted out of the deal to force us into this negotiation in the first place" ("The Jim Rome Show," 2/15).
|Goodell writes in Op-Ed that it is time for|
"serious negotiations" for new labor deal
SPEAKING FOR THE FANS: In his weekly column for the PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS, former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell writes, "It has become fashionable to say that the current NFL labor dispute is a battle pitting millionaires (the players) vs. billionaires (the owners). In a sense, that's true, but it omits a very important component, one that makes the players and owners so rich -- the fans. ... Neither side seems to care about us at all. Each side talks about how detrimental a lockout would be, but neither side has recognized what would happen to us if there were no football in 2011." Rendell added, "How will it end? By getting all the parties -- union, owners, commissioner Roger Goodell in a room for 'round-the-clock, nonstop negotiating sessions, with no one going home until there's an agreement. ... Both sides must give a little" (PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS, 2/16).