Philips Arena Renovation Could Start Soon "TMNT" Returning As Chicagoland Race Sponsor Goodell: NFL "Studying" Marijuana Use Joshua-Klitschko To Draw Record Crowd NFL Draft Overnight Best Since '14 Sources: Pacers' Bird Stepping Down Raiders Hosting Draft Party In Las Vegas SBJ In-Depth: Facilities - Concessions Jack Link's Gets Creative With Draft Exposure Sharapova's Return Injects Needed Star Power
SBD/October 19, 2010/Leagues and Governing BodiesPrint All
The NBPA has threatened legal action over the NBA's decision to issue more technical fouls this season, but it "won't result in league executives rethinking the crackdown," according to a source cited by Ken Berger of CBSSPORTS.com. There has been no public comment from NBA Commissioner David Stern "or any of his lieutenants in light of the NBPA's threat," but the source said that league officials are "determined to put a stop to constant complaining about calls and verbal abuse of officials and won't cave as a result of the NBPA's threat." The source: "I don't think it will have any effect." Berger wrote it "appears that the NBA and the players' union are headed for a showdown." The "closest parallel in recent showdowns between the NBA and the union came during the 2006-07 season, when league executives backtracked on their switch to a synthetic Spalding ball after years of using a leather ball." The synthetic ball was "widely panned by players, and the union filed a grievance with the National Labor Relations Board saying it wasn't consulted about what amounted to a drastic change in working conditions." Berger noted after a few weeks the NBA "pulled the synthetic ball and went back to leather" (CBSSPORTS.com, 10/15).
CASE IN POINT: In Charlotte, Rick Bonnell writes yesterday's Bobcats-Heat preseason game was a "great illustration of how much more harsh the technical foul rule is now." Bobcats F Stephen Jackson received a technical after he "did nothing more than run in referee Curtis Blair's direction and look quizzically after he was called for a walk in the first half." Later, Heat F Chris Bosh received a technical "for shouting 'I did not do that,' after a foul call." Bonnell: "I'm sure the refs are just doing what they've been told. But those two technicals suggest not even a peep will be tolerated" (CHARLOTTE OBSERVER, 10/19). In West Palm Beach, Ethan Skolnick writes the two technicals were "much too quick." In both cases, it "didn't appear that the players did -- or said -- much to deserve them." Heat F LeBron James: "Right now, guys are getting technicals and I've seen a couple of my teammates get technicals for I'm-not-going-to-say-nothing but really nothing." James added, "I just think the emotion of the game can never be taken out of the game of basketball. And that's when the fans, that's when the real guys, and the people who are watching and who know the game of basketball will know there's a problem with the game. ... If we try to take that out of the game, the fans don't like it as much" (PALMBEACHPOST.com, 10/18).
RUMBLINGS OF LEGAL ACTION: FanHouse.com's Kevin Blackistone noted "everything is negotiated in the CBA." Blackistone: "It seems to me that if they're going to make a significant move like this, then everybody should be on-board with it." ESPN.com J.A. Adande noted it is "not just the technicals, it's a double fine too, so two grand now on arbitrary decisions you're asking these players to pay up." Adande: "I think there's legal action behind this" ("Around The Horn," ESPN, 10/18). ESPN's Tony Kornheiser said Stern thinks of NBPA Exec Dir Billy Hunter as a "gnat flying around his face." Kornheiser added of the NBPA, "Stern doesn't have to worry about them. What Stern has to worry about is the paying public and losing big stars from games" ("PTI," ESPN, 10/15).
FOR GOOD OF THE GAME? Boston Globe columnist Bob Ryan noted there have been "innumerable technicals and even ejections already which, if this keeps up, will adversely impact the game." Ryan: "Enough. How about making traveling and palming points of emphasis? … Fact: It's an emotional game, okay? Don't worry so much about protecting the refs. The players are the game" ("The Sports Reporters," ESPN, 10/17). But in Illinois, Mike McGraw wrote "less complaining is good for the NBA." The league's stars have "turned playing the crowd and working the officials into an art form" (Illinois DAILY HERALD, 10/18). In New Jersey, Steve Adamek writes the "bottom line" is that players have "complained too much for years and the rule is designed to curb that." Adamek: "This rule will soften. And the whining about the no-whining rule will stop" (Bergen RECORD, 10/19). In Jacksonville, David Johnson wrote, "The NBA made the right move here, and let's hope commissioner David Stern stands firm. Fans are tired of watching NBA players complain, then seeing how obvious the foul call was" (FLORIDA TIMES-UNION, 10/17)
In N.Y., Alan Schwarz reports the NFL and NFLPA yesterday announced that they “would expand qualifications for the 88 Plan, which since 2007 has assisted former players with medical expenses related to dementia, to include amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig’s disease.” Boston Univ. researchers in August found that “some deceased athletes who had been found to have ALS in fact had a different disease that … caused similar degeneration of the central nervous system.” The NFL and NFLPA said in a statement that players with ALS, similar to those with dementia, do not “need to demonstrate that the condition was caused by their participation in the NFL” (N.Y. TIMES, 10/19).
REINFORCING A BAD TREND? In N.Y., William Rhoden wrote “today’s NFL cheerleaders are little more than props that reinforce objectified sex roles,” as the professional cheerleader “has become feminized and eroticized.” Team owners “should consider jettisoning the eye-candy culture of cheerleaders” because it is “silly as much as it’s sexist.” Giants President & CEO John Mara, whose team does not have cheerleaders, said, “Philosophically we have always had issues with sending scantily clad women out on the field to entertain our fans. It’s just not part of our philosophy.” Mara added, “Each team has got to make its own decision on that. Some teams are comfortable with not only having cheerleaders but selling cheerleader swimsuit calendars or in a couple cases lingerie calendars. It’s not something you’re going to see the Giants do. Not while I’m around, anyway” (N.Y. TIMES, 10/17).
SHOW ME THE MONEY: In Boston, Kevin Paul Dupont noted when Donald Fehr “gets around to running the Players Association -- formal ratification by the players is expected on or around Nov. 1 -- one of the loudest laments he’ll hear from the players will be their ongoing objection to the CBA’s escrow holdings.” The players last season had 18% of their gross earnings “pulled out of their pay as a contingency, pending final computation of the NHL’s total Hockey Related Revenues.” When final HRR figures were “handed over days ago, the players were handed back” 8.59%. That means “each player surrendered” 9.41% of their ’09-10 pay (BOSTON GLOBE, 10/17).
BRINGING SPECTATORS BACK: In Las Vegas, Steve Carp wrote actor/singer Justin Timberlake “has no magic button to push to bring the spectators out” to the PGA Tour Justin Timberlake Shriners Hospitals for Children Open, but it is “not stopping him from trying.” Timberlake: “It’s really a challenge; I’m not going to lie to you. It’s not the easiest thing to put together, particularly with the time I have to devote to the tournament.” Timberlake is “contractually bound to the Shriners” through ’12, and he is “not counting down the days until the deal expires.” Timberlake: “As of now, I don’t have a time limit. I want to grow the tournament. That’s what my mindset is. There is no timetable” (LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, 10/17).