- MLS Dynamo Stadium Almost Complete
- Ramsey County Revises Vikings Stadium Fina ...
- Facility Notes
- Honda Center Breaks Ground On $20M Expansi ...
- Marlins' Sculpture Will Celebrate Home Run ...
- Sacramento Arena Talks Expected To Intensi ...
- Facility Notes
- Cleveland Gives Browns $5.8M For Stadium
- Bobcats, NFL Panthers Look To Revamp Venue ...
- Developers Team On Nassau Coliseum Site Pl ...
Upcoming Conferences and Events
-
Mar 21-22
-
Mar 22
-
May 23
-
May 30-31
-
Jun 5-7
SBD/Issue 97/Facilities & Venues
Bengals Offer County Financial Concessions On Stadium Lease
Published February 2, 2010
![]() |
| Bengals Offer Short- And Long-Term Financial Concessions For Lease At Paul Brown Stadium |
STRINGS ATTACHED? In Cincinnati, Jessica Brown writes the Bengals' $40M offer "won't fix the problem and comes with several strings -- one of which, if true, would soundly sink the deal." The county commissioners said that "one of the concessions appears to allow the Bengals to end the lease -- and potentially leave Cincinnati -- in 2017." That is "nearly 10 years earlier than the current lease allows." But the team indicated that the "paragraph in question simply solidifies the lease as it currently stands, until 2016." The Bengals' concessions "still won't generate enough revenue to fix" the county's stadium fund. That means the county has a "lot of money to come up with before this problem is solved." But the commissioners said that the "good thing about the offer ... is that the Bengals have come to the table." It is the "first time that's happened in nearly a decade." The "bad thing for the county is that the Bengals still hold all the cards" (CINCINNATI ENQUIRER, 2/2). Hamilton County Commissioner Todd Portune yesterday said that he "thinks the Bengals' offer to help the county fix its stadium fund is a bad deal." Portune: "They're asking us to give up every penny we'd ever make on the stadium. They'd be let out of the lease as early as 2017." Pepper said that he was "concerned about the wording of the letter too, but that the team has assured him they didn't intend to insinuate that they'd leave early and that they don't plan to do so" (CINCINNATI.com, 2/1).
STARTING POINT: In Cincinnati, Paul Daugherty writes, "It's good the team wants to talk. Let's not forget that after the club bludgeoned the county in the lease deal, the county sued the club, and lost." If the team "never wanted to speak to the county again, that would be understandable." But the fact that the Bengals "even offered to talk is laudable." The Bengals "want all money from any naming-rights deal," and they "want all revenues from every event" at the stadium. They also "want the county's luxury box back, so they can lease it themselves." The Bengals "aren't exactly making a benevolent gesture," but "did you expect they would?" Nonetheless, "it's a start" (CINCINNATI ENQUIRER, 2/2).







