Jim Irsay's Trial Postponed MLB Unveils Players For Japan Series DGS, GK Rolling Out Liukin Products Camera Helmet Gaining Traction 49ers Re-Sodding Levi's Stadium Leiweke Plans To Leave MLSE In June '15 NASCAR Assigns Phelps, O'Donnell To Top Posts In N.C. Cavs, Indians Get Public Funds Approved Longtime NFL Ref Avoided Redskins Games Classified Advertisements
SBD/Issue 102/Collegiate SportsPrint All
O'Bannon Expected To Name
More Plaintiffs To Suit
WE'VE ONLY JUST BEGUN: While O'Bannon is the only named plaintiff thus far, King said that a "list of players from different eras will be added in about a month." USA TODAY's Marlen Garcia notes Wilkin yesterday dismissed the suit from former Arizona State football player Craig Newsome, and combined O'Bannon's case with that of former Nebraska and Arizona State QB Sam Keller, who "filed a similar suit against the NCAA" and Electronic Arts. King said that NCAA's "related financial records and those of member schools and conferences will be scrutinized in order to give the court a figure for damages." He said, "Performers are entitled to be compensated. This is the one business in America that has operated to the contrary. Now, we'll find out what the numbers are." Garcia notes a "setback for the players" was Wilken's dismissal of "common-law accounting claims against the NCAA" and Collegiate Licensing Co. (USA TODAY, 2/9).
NCAA UNDER FIRE: YAHOO SPORTS' Dan Wetzel noted O'Bannon's attorneys "can now begin the discovery process that may unlock how the business operates, which could have an impact beyond this case." King said, "This is a truly historic day -- to our knowledge, no one has ever gotten behind the scenes to examine how student-athletes' current and future rights in their images are divided up and sold." Wetzel noted the case "could lead to former student-athletes getting a cut of the multi-billion dollar college sports revenue pool and dramatically impact the way college athletics operates" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 2/8). The NCAA's licensing deals are estimated at more than $4B, and Univ. of Vermont law professor Michael McCann believes that the case "would probably be followed closely by members of Congress who were interested in the NCAA's tax-exempt status." McCann: "I think it's an important case because it gets at the core of the student-athlete mission" (N.Y. TIMES, 2/9).