- NHL To Keep Labor Talks Private
- Stern: NBA In Good Shape This Year
- Daytona To Offer Mid-Race Bonus
- Barcelona, Real Madrid Outpacing ManU In R ...
- League Notes
- LPGA Begins Season With Expanded Schedule
- Shortened NBA Season Resulting In Bad Prod ...
- League Notes
- NFL Faces Decisions On L.A., Alumni
- Roger Goodell Delivers State Of NFL Addres ...
Upcoming Conferences and Events
-
Mar 21-22
-
Mar 22
-
May 23
-
May 30-31
-
Jun 5-7
SBD/Issue 101/Leagues & Governing Bodies
NBA Owners Push For Some Elements Of Hard Cap, Reduced Salaries
Published February 8, 2010
![]() |
REDUCING MAXIMUM SALARIES? ESPN.com's Ric Bucher cited a source as saying that the owners' proposal includes "rollbacks that could reduce maximum guaranteed salaries" for players to "almost a third of what they would have been eligible for under the current agreement." The source said that the "total value for a veteran maximum deal would be well under" $60M, and "for players currently on rookie salary-scale deals well under" $50M. Fully-guaranteed maximum deals also "could be a thing of the past, with the proposal allowing for less than half of any contract to be guaranteed." Several sources added that the "mid-level exception and other devices that allow teams over the salary cap to sign free agents also would be abolished," effectively "creating a hard cap." Bucher wrote "perhaps the biggest shocker" is that the owners' proposal includes a "provision that would require any pre-existing deals to be revised to conform to the new deal's limits." One agent said, "If the top players are united against [NBA Commissioner David Stern], that's going to make for a tough fight. It could get very ugly." Several sources said that "presenting a new proposal nearly 18 months in advance of the current deal's anticipated expiration is unprecedented" (ESPN.com, 2/7).
PLAYERS REACT: Magic C and NBPA First VP Adonal Foyle yesterday called the owners' latest CBA offer "'unfair' and said the owners' proposed salary rollbacks have mobilized and united the league's players." Foyle: "Doing that is probably the fatal flaw, because if there is one way to unite the entire NBA against a single thing it would be to go after everybody. I think what this proposal has done has done us a favor. It has basically mobilized all our players. ... Now they have awakened not only the players who have been constantly involved in these kinds of negotiations, but they've awakened the guys that would have been on the outside looking in" (ORLANDO SENTINEL, 2/8). Foyle added, "It's a proposal that's far-reaching. This (new proposal) has gone too far. It wants a hard cap, it basically will create no middle class" (ESPN.com, 2/7). But Stern said, "At the end of the day, we have a combined interest with our players to grow the pie to the greatest extent possible. And then we need a sustained business model to make sure that our players in effect remain the highest-paid players in professional sports and that our teams have the opportunity to be profitable" (AP, 2/7).
LOCKOUT LOOMING? In N.Y., Mitch Lawrence wrote the NBA is "awash in red ink, making the prospects even greater for a lockout starting on July 1, 2011." An ownership source familiar with franchise finances said teams that are "losing tons of money this season" include the Hawks, Grizzlies, Pistons, Heat, Magic, Hornets, Thunder, Pacers, Nets, T'Wolves, Bobcats, Bucks and 76ers. The Mavericks, who are hosting this week's All-Star Weekend festivities, also are "reportedly in the red." The source: "Everybody is thinking there's going to be a lockout. The owners are serious about a lockout. The economics of the present deal just don't work" (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 2/7).
FREE AGENT IMPACT: In Cleveland, Brian Windhorst wrote a hard cap "levels the entire playing field and, in fact, could penalize a team that has a player" like LeBron James. Teams that have players "making huge money ... may not have the options to surround that player with as much talent." In the short run, the "threat of these measures virtually guarantees" that big-name free agents "will opt out of their contracts this summer." It also may "change what they're looking for when they do sign somewhere." Windhorst: "With the danger of new, less favorable max contract rules, they may instead look to sign for longer terms to stay grandfathered into the current system" (Cleveland PLAIN DEALER, 2/7).








