Execs Arrested On FIFA Corruption Charges Can Harper Supplant Jeter As Face Of MLB? NFL Analyzing Possible L.A. Relocation Fee Brady-Goodell Battle Taking Shape MLB Looking Into Economics Of Shortened Season IndyCar Ponders How To Attract Fans Long Term NHL Coaching Salaries Likely To Change MLB Looking Closer At Holding Games Abroad Euro Tour Hopes To Close Gap With U.S. Circuit Many Indifferent Toward New Extra Point Rule
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/Issue 100/Leagues & Governing Bodies
NFLPA Reiterates Stance League Wants Players To Take 18% Cut
Published February 5, 2010
|Smith Not Agreeing To An
18% Cut To Players' Salaries
HOW LIKELY IS A LOCKOUT? If a new CBA is not reached by March 5, the '10 season will be played without a salary cap. And if no deal is reached by March '11, the owners could lock the players out. NFLPA President Kevin Mawae said the players are expecting that to happen. The question and answer session of the NFLPA press conference Thursday was kicked off by Bengals WR Chad Ochocinco, who asked how serious the threat of a lockout was in '11. Smith responded on a scale of 1 to 10, "I'd call it a 14." Smith also proposed that NFL clubs donate 2% of their profits to a legacy fund to be distributed to retired players. Pash said that the NFL was the first to propose increasing retired players benefits (Daniel Kaplan & Liz Mullen, SportsBusiness Journal).
DARK CLOUDS AHEAD: The AP’s Tim Reynolds wrote the NFLPA Thursday “painted perhaps the bleakest picture yet regarding prospects of labor strife in the league.” Smith: “I keep coming back to an economic model in America that is unparalleled. And that makes it incredibly difficult to then come to players and say, on average, each of you needs to take a $340,000 pay cut to save the National Football League. Tough Sell” (AP, 2/4). However, Pash, referring to claims players are being asked to take an 18% pay cut, said, “The change is nowhere close to 18%. It’s probably half that. But more important -- our proposal should not result, and we have never said it would result, in players having to take a reduction.” Responding to a comment by Smith that the league is a nonprofit organization under the tax code, Pash said, “It’s a nonprofit organization in the same way that De Smith’s old law firm is a nonprofit organization -- the owners or partners pay taxes on what their earnings are. The partnership doesn’t pay the taxes. He knows this” (N.Y. TIMES, 2/5). Meanwhile, in Pittsburgh, Ed Bouchette notes in an “unusual move, the NFLPA issued a list of prospective restricted free agents Thursday and did so assuming no new collective bargaining agreement [will be] in place, resulting in an uncapped year.” Based on that, “new rules take place, including a measure that extends from four to six years the length of time a player needs to serve before he can become an unrestricted free agent” (PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE, 2/5).
Writer Says Smith "Almost Too Slick"