Tustin Wants To Recoup Angels Ballpark Investment New Maple Leaf Square Name Skips Confusion AEG Seeks Extension On L.A. Stadium Project Patterson: Taxpayers Should Help With New UT Arena Stanford Teams With AT&T, Sporting Innovations Facility Notes Angels End Lease Talks With Anaheim Barclays Center Not Yet Fit For Islanders Games Red Wings Break Ground On Arena Project Colorado State Stadium Falling Short
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/Issue 93/Facilities & Venues
TMS Execs Capitalizing On New NASCAR Attitude In Billboards
Published January 27, 2010
|Texas Motor Speedway Billboards Promote
NASCAR's Relaxed On-Track Rules
MICHIGAN CUTTING TICKET PRICES: Michigan Int'l Speedway (MIS) President Roger Curtis yesterday said that ticket prices for the facility's two NASCAR Sprint Cup Series races "have been lowered." Curtis: "This is something that should have been done years ago, but it really made sense with the economy being the way it is now. We wanted to find a way to offer prices that made sense to people." In Detroit, David Goricki notes general admission tickets "start at $25, down from $40 with the highest price reserved ticket ... going down from $110 to $105." Meanwhile, Curtis said ticket sales are "down slightly, single digits from the same time last year." Curtis: "We feel we'll be at the same 100,000 mark as last year and that would be a huge success story with today's economy." Curtis yesterday also "introduced Heluva Good as the new main sponsor" of the June 13 Sprint Cup Series race, while Carfax "returns to sponsor" the August 15 Sprint Cup Series race (DETROIT NEWS, 1/27).
TRACK POSITION: Earnhardt Ganassi Racing co-Owner Felix Sabates recently suggested that NASCAR cut back on the number of events it holds, including eliminating both Sprint Cup races at MIS. But SCENEDAILY.com's Bob Pockrass wrote Sabates' suggestion of "moving both races from Michigan just because the state is going through a tough time would be the worst public relations move ever." He added shortening the season to 30 races "would not be the way to go." Pockrass: "In these tough economic times, when sponsors need as much exposure as possible and the sport needs as much publicity as it can get, decreasing exposure to fans in the stands and on television is not the right move" (SCENEDAILY.com, 1/26).