- AEG Entertaining China Clients In L.A.
- Millrose Games Enterting New Era
- Bradley Center Raising Ticket Fee
- NASCAR Moving Foundation To Daytona Beach
- Coors Light Presents Sportsnet Trade Cover ...
- NBA, ESPN Team Up For "The Announcement"
- MLS Dynamo Stadium Almost Complete
- Packers To Raise Ticket Prices Next Season
- NHL To Keep Labor Talks Private
- Sports Magazine Ad Revenue For '11
Upcoming Conferences and Events
-
Mar 21-22
-
Mar 22
-
May 23
-
May 30-31
-
Jun 5-7
SBD/Issue 77/Sponsorships, Advertising & Marketing
EA Reiterates Support For Tiger Woods, Will Launch Online Game
Published January 5, 2010
![]() |
| EA Will Release An Online, Subscription- Based Version Of Woods Game Later This Year |
A LOOK AT THE SCORECARD: USA TODAY's Michael McCarthy notes since Woods' car accident on November 27, "six sponsors have stood by him while five have either dumped him, dialed back his image in marketing efforts or discontinued his products." Nike, EA Sports, Upper Deck, NetJets, TLC Vision and the Tiger Woods Dubai resort all have "publicly supported" the golfer. Conversely, AT&T and Accenture have severed ties with Woods, while Tag Heuer and Gillette have said that "they're bowing to his request for privacy by putting his image on ice in their ad campaigns." Gatorade also is dropping its Tiger-themed line of drinks, though the company "made the call before" Woods' accident (USA TODAY, 1/5).
UP OR DOWN? ESPN.com's Jason Sobel wrote "severing or decreasing ties with Tiger Woods isn't just a knee-jerk reaction." It is the "right move -- and it has little to do with morals and ethics." While execs for AT&T, Accenture, Tag Heuer and Gillette "may personally disapprove of Woods' admitted infidelities, each has dropped its sponsorship of the golfer or pulled back its promotional campaigns solely because of monetary value." Sobel: "Are any of these companies ever going to gain international attention simply by having a logo on Woods' golf bag or by using his likeness in television advertising? Not like this" (ESPN.com, 1/4). But BLOOMBERG NEWS' Matthew Lynn writes the sponsors downsizing ties with Woods have "misunderstood why they wanted celebrity endorsements in the first place." Companies need "authenticity, not bland corporate perfection," so if they "aren't willing to accept that their 'ambassadors' are real people, with all the flaws and fallibilities that come with that package, there is no point in having them on the payroll." When corporations "attempt to set themselves up as moral arbiters, they just end up making themselves look out of touch." Lynn: "You have to be amused by the priggishness and hypocrisy of the corporate honchos who have decided that Woods is about as socially acceptable as a Sunday afternoon golfer hacking divots into the fairways at St. Andrews" (BLOOMBERG NEWS, 1/5).








