Bettman Praises Shanahan's League Office Work NWSL Eyes Elusive Stability, Viability Judge Denies NFL Concussion Settlement Selig Praises New Replay System Production Dips For Some NHL Clubs Post-Olympics Vikings, Twins Owners Want Expansion MLS Club La Russa Happy With Replay So Far Not All NHLers Like New Playoff Format Haas Bullish On New F1 Team Golf's Young Talent Steps Into Spotlight
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/Issue 36/Leagues & Governing Bodies
NHLPA Meeting Called After Ouellet Tabbed As Temporary Exec Dir
Published November 2, 2009
HOSTILE TAKEOVER? Penny, who has worked at the union since '00 and was appointed as interim Exec Dir after Kelly was fired, resigned Friday morning. A week prior to his resignation, Penny wrote a letter expressing concerns that the investigation being conducted by the four-member committee included surveillance of staff, intimidation of staff and the potential of leaking confidential information concerning staff and NHL players. Last week, the four-member review committee sent a letter to staff, agents and NHLPA members placing restrictions on staff, the interim ombudsman and the advisory board, including asking advisory board members “to avoid any contact with association staff or with individual executive board members.” Several advisory board members resigned on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, citing those restrictions, among other things, as reasons for their resignations. “Much has been said by some Executive Board members, their Agents, and selected players (most of them have never shown interest in the PA in the past),” Pink, a former Advisory Board Chair, wrote in his resignation letter. “The individuals (who) have assumed control of the PA and are dictating actions likely contrary to the Constitution and have, in my view, subjected the PA to potential legal liability.” Larmer, a former NHLPA Dir of Player Relations, wrote, “Certain players with the assistance of their agents have in a sense hijacked the union. They have used the cover of an operations review to paralyze the NHLPA staff and placed certain employees under surveillance. It is my understanding that the former Executive Director, Paul Kelly, has communicated with Chris Chelios and Shawn Horcoff and others directing them to investigate the affairs of the PA.” Attempts to reach Chelios, Horcoff and Kelly for comment on Larmer’s letter were unsuccessful. Baumgartner in his resignation letter wrote, “I have grave concerns around the direction that the Review Committee is taking you. Those who loudly proclaim to protect the Constitution appear to have ignored it” (Liz Mullen, SportsBusiness Journal). In Ottawa, Bruce Garrioch reported NHLPA Advisory Board members Dan O'Neill and Ron Lloyd also stepped down (OTTAWA SUN, 10/31). In addition, Advisory Board member Ian Troop resigned (CBC.ca, 10/31).
PLAYING DEFENSE: The four-player review committee yesterday responded to rumors that the union had ceased operations and the committee was now running the union. “We are disappointed by the suggestions made by Steve Larmer and others that the NHLPA has suspended operations, as he and others told the press on Friday, or that our Review Committee has hijacked the union somehow, that we had employees under surveillance and suspended the offices of Ombudsman, Divisional Player Representatives and Advisory Board,” the Review group said in its letter Sunday. “We did not do any of that” (Mullen).
From NHLPA Friday
PLAYERS WANT ANSWERS: The OTTAWA SUN's Garrioch cited sources as saying that players are “furious and ‘demanding answers’” after the rash of resignations (OTTAWA SUN, 10/31). The CBC’s Glenn Healy said, “The players want answers. Coming out of the mess in Chicago (where Kelly was dismissed), I think they want answers to questions. Looking back on it, I think Ian Penny probably had some regrets about the way this whole thing went down. I think he looks at that train he got on with some of his advisors and says, ‘It got out of control. I couldn’t stop it.’” Healy: “It’s very curious that the investigation goes forward, and four days later there’re a lot of resignations." The CBC’s Mike Milbury: “They just jumped ship very, very quickly. But now that they have, it’s almost completely cleaned up." Healy said, “The purge is not yet done, I don’t think. And the constitution in my mind needs to be better. It has to be better for it to work" ("HNIC," CBC, 10/31).
|The CBC's Healy Says The NHLPA Review
Committee Is Working On Behalf Of Players
RUNNING OUT OF OPTIONS: ESPN.com’s Scott Burnside wrote under the header, “It’s Official: Union Hits Rock Bottom.” The union is a “rudderless ship,” and the rash of resignations raises the question, “Who’s in charge?” A source said, “The answer is nobody.” An agent added, “It’s a farce.” Burnside noted there “seem to be two clear options for the players.” First, they can “begin to pick up the pieces of their torn association and begin the search for both a new executive director and new general counsel.” The second option is “bringing back Kelly”(ESPN.com, 10/30). An agent said of the union, “It’s unraveling. These wounds are not going to heal in an instant. The guys need to get it together” (TORONTO STAR, 11/1). Kings D and player rep Matt Greene said, “There’s a lot of problems in the office right now. I think the players themselves are becoming more aware of what’s going on and taking a lot bigger interest in what’s going on than the guys have before. Hopefully, it’s just the start of a growing process for us and we become a stronger union.” Greene added, “We’re not rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic here. We know where we’re going. We've got a good hull. We should stay afloat” (L.A. TIMES, 11/2).
IN NEED OF A FRESH START: In Toronto, Damien Cox wrote only with a “clean slate, can the union start to rebuild.” The “next step will have to be a tweaking of the union’s constitution, which is filled with so many checks and balances that it was inevitable that power struggles would result” (THESTAR.com, 10/30). Milbury said of the union, "They’ve got to continue … to clean house and get a fresh start, they need to look at the constitution and start from scratch before the new guy comes in.” Milbury added the player reps “don’t have time to bring in a guy who’s not hockey-savvy.” Milbury: “He’s got to know some of the personalities, he’s got to know some of the history. If he rides shotgun with a heavy-duty labor lawyer, I’ve got no problem with that. But there’s got to be a one-two punch here because I don’t think there’s anybody out there who’s a hockey guy and also a labor lawyer” (“HNIC,” CBC, 10/31). NHL player agent Allan Walsh said a “strong PA will most likely guard against another lookout. Right now, what’s going on is disheartening for many reasons” (OTTAWA SUN, 11/1). LeBrun said because of the uncertainties around the union, there is “almost no question that the NHLPA will pick up that seventh year, the option year, that they have on the CBA. They have to, they have no time” ("HNIC," CBC, 10/31).