Indians' Streak Helps Ticket Sales Shapiro Addresses Rogers Centre Concerns Rapids Formally Introduce Tim Howard T'Wolves Welcome First Chinese Minority Owner Yankees-StubHub Deal Includes Resale Price Floor Brewers Attendance Consistent With Expectations Raiders Send Las Vegas Fan, Stadium Surveys Foley Not Concerned About Potential Struggles Judge Orders Temporary Stop To Preds Hearing Packers Bring In $408.7M In Record Revenue
NFL Sources: Checketts Enhanced Rams Bid By Dropping Limbaugh
Published October 15, 2009
|Checketts Dropping Limbaugh From Rams
Bid Group Is Front-Page News In St. Louis
MOVING ON WITHOUT HIM: Checketts yesterday issued a statement regarding his bid for the Rams -- the first time he has publicly addressed the situation -- confirming his interest in purchasing the team. Checketts also addressed Limbaugh's role in the bid, saying, "Rush was to be a limited partner. ... However, it has become clear that his involvement in our group has become a complication and a distraction to our intentions; endangering our bid to keep the team in St. Louis. As such, we have decided to move forward without him" (THE DAILY). Checketts' statement came shortly after Limbaugh on his radio show vowed that he "had no intentions of dropping his efforts to buy the team." Limbaugh said, "I'm not even thinking of exiting. ... It's a sad thing that our country, over 200 years old now, needs pioneers all over again, but we do" (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 10/15). Limbaugh had said that he "would take an active role in managing the team" (WALL STREET JOURNAL, 10/15).
RUSH'S SIDE OF THE STORY: Limbaugh opened today’s episode of his radio show talking about the failed Rams partnership. He said he saw Checketts at a golf course near St. Louis, and that Checketts talked to him about the possibilities of the Rams deal. Checketts and his group went to Limbaugh's home in late May or early June and made their pitch, telling him, “We would like you very much to be a part of this.” Limbaugh said a brief financial breakdown of what would be involved was discussed. Limbaugh: “Based on what he showed me, I said, ‘OK, I’m in.’ I said to him, ‘Are you aware of the firestorm [this will lead to]?’” Limbaugh noted Checketts acknowledged yes, saying, "I wouldn’t have approached you if I hadn’t taken care of that.” He said Checketts assured him that he would not have approached him if he had not “cleared your involvement with people at the highest levels.” Limbaugh: “He gave me some names … and he led me to believe it was all handled and he was fully prepared what was going to happen.” Limbaugh said Checketts called him Tuesday night and asked him to withdraw from the bid. Limbaugh said, “But I thought you had this wired?” Checketts said that he could not “go forward with you in the group.” Limbaugh, “I said ‘I won’t withdraw. You go public and you fire me.’ Which he did” (“The Rush Limbaugh Show,” 10/15).
NEVER STOOD A CHANCE: SI.com's Don Banks cited NFL sources as saying Limbaugh's role in any Rams bid had "zero chance" of being approved by a necessary 75% majority of the league's owners. A league source said, "The league would be on pins and needles for three hours a day, five days a week. The NFL isn't interested in having its own Mark Cuban situation, where (the Dallas Mavericks owner) is fined for something he said, but then pays the fine, moves on and doesn't care what he says the next time either. The league wants the focus to always be on the game, not the opinions of any particular owner" (SI.com, 10/14). In Philadelphia, Ashley Fox writes there was "no place for Limbaugh in the NFL," and the "rush to judgment was swift, effective and now complete." This was about a "professional sports league not wanting to have an alleged racist among them" (PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, 10/15). Yahoo Sports columnist Adrian Wojnarowski: "He had no chance, and the thing with Limbaugh is he's trying to turn this into this is an attack on political conservatism. ... What this is is people do not want a bigot as an owner. He's a racist" ("Jim Rome Is Burning," ESPN, 10/14). Dolphins WR Greg Camarillo yesterday said, "The NFL is obviously a diverse workplace and you've got to be pretty sensitive to everybody's needs. You can't alienate any group." But Dolphins LB Channing Crowder contends, "If Rush Limbaugh will sign the checks, everybody will play for him" (PALM BEACH POST, 10/15).
DID NOT NEED THE RISK: ESPN's Colin Cowherd said the NFL is "so powerful it doesn't need anybody. Rush Limbaugh is a very controversial host, and the NFL is like a very elite country club and they're not going to let members in just because you have the money. They don't need to gamble" ("SportsNation," ESPN2, 10/14). ESPN's Jim Rome: "It's like trying to join Augusta National or any other exclusive golf club: It doesn't matter how much money you have or how famous you are, if they don't like you, you're not getting in and they don’t need to provide you with an explanation" ("Jim Rome Is Burning," ESPN, 10/14).
Owners Question Checketts'
Involvement With Limbaugh
UNDER REVIEW: CNBC.com's Darren Rovell noted some sources "expect Limbaugh to fight Checketts." But Rovell wrote, "I don't. I expect the straight shooter in Roger Goodell to call Limbaugh up and say his money is not welcome at any time. You can do that when you're a private business. Even if you are trying to assist in selling a hopeless team" (CNBC.com, 10/14). In Orlando, George Diaz writes talk of Limbaugh's interest in the Rams "turned ugly the last few days," and that "does absolutely nothing to advance race relations in this country." Diaz: "That's the game that Rush plays. And that's not in the NFL playbook" (ORLANDO SENTINEL, 10/15). But in Ft. Lauderdale, Ethan Skolnick wrote the NFL "should not have blackballed Rush Limbaugh, which is essentially what it did." The league "should have let 'market forces' ... work." It should have let Limbaugh "go through the process, rather than applying enough public pressure to force his removal" (SUN-SENTINEL.com, 10/14). WSCR-AM’s Matt Rodewald said Limbaugh "comes out a winner" in the situation because the NFL likes the "quiet aspect of the league, and he gets all the PR and he gets to come away looking good for once” (“Chicago Tribune Live,” CSN Chicago, 10/14).
Irsay Has Said He Would Vote
Against A Group Including Limbaugh
LEADING BY EXAMPLE: In Manchester, Lawrence Donegan writes under the header, "NFL's Resistance To Rush Limbaugh Puts English Football To Shame." The NFL, like English soccer, has "strict guidelines on who can and cannot own a team," but unlike English soccer, "these guidelines are strictly applied, not just in letter but also in spirit." Donegan: "What a stunning contrast to the self-serving indifference and greed that has characterised the response of football in this country as a succession of hucksters and tinpot dictators have tunnelled all the way into the very heart of the game" (GUARDIAN.co.uk, 10/15).